Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
It doesn't. That is the problem.I'll ask you again. Where in the Bible does it say that?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It doesn't. That is the problem.I'll ask you again. Where in the Bible does it say that?
Name calling and ad hominem are the last resort of the defeated.
I see. So even though thoroughly defeated you place to solider on. That sounds like masochism to me.Bull****.
It doesn't. That is the problem.
I see. So even though thoroughly defeated you place to solider on. That sounds like masochism to me.
Pigeon chess.I'm not thoroughly defeated, you are. You just don't have the sense to see that.
That seems to be all you can offer.Bull****.
That appears to be the case. They have six that they use to walk. A pair that they use specifically for jumping. And they can walk with the front pro- and mesothoracic legs while leaving the metathoracic legs poised for jumping.I've seen them turn using four legs and maybe walk a bit on a leaf on four legs.
Most likely because it's being cautious with its legs ready to jump at a moment's notice.
Seems pretty typical of pigeon chess to me.I see. So even though thoroughly defeated you place to solider on. That sounds like masochism to me.
Are you suggesting that disagreeing with your rationalization means a person is not a Christian or recognizing a flaw in the Bible is attacking it. Should I be dishonest like some and pretend it says something it does not?
I missed this classic attack on the beliefs of another that has nothing to do with supporting your claim. You just pulled out all the logical fallacies for this didn't you.And those are, Methodist?
That is true, but the main point was originally to argue that critics that use the biblical description of insects having four legs as indication of its lack of science scholarship are wrong for doing so. Even though the biblical description clearly indicates that insects have only four legs, while descriptions in science clearly indicate the accurate count of six legs.This is a good point and cuts both ways. I'm an atheist, but whether the passages in question are accurate or inaccurate tells me nothing about whether God exists.
I missed this classic attack on the beliefs of another that has nothing to do with supporting your claim. You just pulled out all the logical fallacies for this didn't you.
That seems to be all you can offer.
That is true, but the main point was originally to argue that critics that use the biblical description of insects having four legs as indication of its lack of science scholarship are wrong for doing so. Even though the biblical description clearly indicates that insects have only four legs, while descriptions in science clearly indicate the accurate count of six legs.
Do you have anything to support your claims that do not involve logical fallacies? Anything? Hello. Is there anyone there?It's all that's necessary.
Why do you assume that others do not understand the Bible? Odds are many of them that you accuse of this probably understand the Bible better than you do.Why would it have to be so specific for you to understand it? Does it really have to draw you a picture? Or show you a video? If I tell you that I walked on all fours when I was a baby would you then assume that I had four legs, or if I said I hopped on one leg would that imply to you I only had one? That's what doesn't make sense to me. There's no logic in your protestation.
It is part of the belief that the Bible must be inerrant, infallible and true in every word or belief in God falls apart.Yup. Personally, I'm uninterested in this particular point. Some people tie their beliefs to funny things, and then get stuck 'dying on that hill', so to speak.
This particular hill doesn't appear to indicate whether God exists or not.
So regardless of belief, it's possible to see this as unimportant.
Oh my . Denial is not a river in Egypt. You started your post with a false attack and totally failed to support any of your claims. That sounds like defeat to me.I'm not thoroughly defeated, you are. You just don't have the sense to see that.
Looks like it too.Oh my . Denial is not a river in Egypt. You started your post with a false attack and totally failed to support any of your claims. That sounds like defeat to me.