The Absolute Truth

[shunyadragon]

The same is my position.
I also never thought to indulge with any discussion/debate with Bahaism people till suddenly I found a group of Bahais here in RF. So, I started reading "Kitab-i-Iqan" and now I know:

• Bahaullah had no "Word of Revelation" from G-d in the sense we Muslim believe Quran is "Word of Revelation" from G-d.
• Bahaullah had a shallow knowledge of Quran as he erred as I found out on several occasion while reading "Kitab-i-Iqan" from my personal knowledge of Quran.
• Bahaullah had no knowledge of Sunni-Hadith, his little knowledge only pertained to the Shia-Hadith, of which he failed to provide references, and not even the UHJ has provided all along these 150+ years.
• My understanding has developed that Bahaullah was not even a Bahai, strictly speaking.
• The present form of Bahaism is more of a fabrication of Abdul Baha and Shoghí Effendí, copying certain mottoes of the Western Society to make it appealing to them.
• Etc.
• Etc.

Thanks to all the Bahaism People in this forum.

Regards

Do not thank the Baha'is for your biased selective ignorance of the Baha'i writings. This has been addressed before A superficial severely biased selective interpretation reading of the Kitab-i-iqan does not represent the scripture nor beliefs of the Revelation of Baha'u'llah.

 

[Nakosis]

No. Because I do. And it's too depressing...

Well... sorry about that.

 

[ecco]

I prefer simplicity of context and dialogue, and anecdotal abstractions.

That's one of the big draws of religion - simplicity. At least until you have to try to defend it.

 

[shunyadragon]

That's one of the big draws of religion - simplicity. At least until you have to try to defend it.

I defend it with rational dialogue, and NOT aggressive antagonistic vindictive attacks.

 

[ecco]

I defend it with rational dialogue, and NOT aggressive antagonistic vindictive attacks.

Your "rational dialogue" includes accepting nonsensical hearsay stories and when I point out you are accepting nonsensical hearsay stories you accuse me of aggressive antagonistic vindictive attacks.

If you can't accept criticism of your posts, perhaps you shouldn't post.

 

[paarsurrey]

The same is my position.
I also never thought to indulge with any discussion/debate with Bahaism people till suddenly I found a group of Bahais here in RF. So, I started reading "Kitab-i-Iqan" and now I know:

• Bahaullah had no "Word of Revelation" from G-d in the sense we Muslim believe Quran is "Word of Revelation" from G-d.
• Bahaullah had a shallow knowledge of Quran as he erred as I found out on several occasion while reading "Kitab-i-Iqan" from my personal knowledge of Quran.
• Bahaullah had no knowledge of Sunni-Hadith, his little knowledge only pertained to the Shia-Hadith, of which he failed to provide references, and not even the UHJ has provided all along these 150+ years.
• My understanding has developed that Bahaullah was not even a Bahai, strictly speaking.
• The present form of Bahaism is more of a fabrication of Abdul Baha and Shoghí Effendí, copying certain mottoes of the Western Society to make it appealing to them.
• Etc.
• Etc.

Thanks to all the Bahaism People in this forum.

Regards

Do not thank the Baha'is for your biased selective ignorance of the Baha'i writings. This has been addressed before A superficial severely biased selective interpretation reading of the Kitab-i-iqan does not represent the scripture nor beliefs of the Revelation of Baha'u'llah.

Your "rational dialogue" includes accepting nonsensical hearsay stories and when I point out you are accepting nonsensical hearsay stories you accuse me of aggressive antagonistic vindictive attacks.

If you can't accept criticism of your posts, perhaps you shouldn't post.

 

[shunyadragon]

?

If you can't accept criticism of your posts, perhaps you shouldn't post.

 

[TransmutingSoul]

People who dwell in fantasy land may just
have a problem distinguishing between what
they make up and what is real.

That is the reality of this world.

Regards Tony