Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
Rabbit Trail. I was pointing out that you don't use the word "conservative" accurately.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
"Survey: 8% of Public School Students Have Had a Teacher Lead the Class in Prayer"
- Thread starter Skwim
- Start date
Rabbit Trail. I was pointing out that you don't use the word "conservative" accurately.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
A rose is a rose no matter what other name you give it.
Indeed. And religious bigotry is still bigotry even if mandated by the religious.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
Define "abuse". And what business is it of yours how the poor choose to live?
You would refuse charity unless the poor fits YOUR arbitrary "moral code"?
That's not CHARITY. That is EXTORTION.
Bob the Unbeliever
Well-Known Member
You don't use "science". .... you use abusive religious bigotry which is 100% opposite of actual science.
It's not a baby until it's born.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You have yet to show that in any way.
By the way, how do you explain the Bible's support for abortion?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I do not think that you are qualified to judge.
I gave the site. I said that at a 12 cell zygote, the person didn't even know they were pregnant. He said I was wrong and need to learn science. So I gave a site which said at 4 weeks it is 32 cells and the size of a poppy seed. How much more smaller if it is almost 3 times smaller?
Even showed a picture.
So a woman still doesn't know she's pregnant, is wondering if maybe her period is late and DEFINITELY doesn't know she has a baby.
Why do you say that what I did and sited doesn't involve science?
Never said I was. Can you site where I said I was?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I would say that your site was terribly misinformed, or you misunderstood. 32 cells at four weeks? Are you kidding me? This site says early on that there is a doubling every twelve hours:
Fetal Development Weeks 1 Through 4
If you find poor sites or cannot understand them you cannot claim to have supported your claims.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Then you should never had made your earlier claim. Now you are effectively contradicting yourself.
What claim?
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
You can click on the quotes to find your original error.
just quoted.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
I could find it. But since you made the claim it was dishonest to defend it if you forgot so soon.
Subduction Zone
Veteran Member
No. The site I used said a doubling every twelve hours. Do the math. Here is a hint, after three days the number is already larger than that.
As I said... there was no claim in reference to what I was talking about with Bob. Unless we are talking about two different things.
As I said... I quoted from the same site. Obviously the site must be wrong but at 12 cells, you still don't know you are pregnant which is what Bob and I were discussing.
If you want to start a strawman issue, I'm not buying.