King Phenomenon
Well-Known Member
Do you think science tries to explain God and the mysteries of life through subliminal messages in a similar way that religion might try to explain it?
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
No.Do you think science tries to explain God and the mysteries of life through subliminal messages in a similar way that religion tries to explain it?
I guess you would have to ask the scientists that. Whether or not they tell you the truth is out of my hands.What makes you think science tries to explain god?
No, but I think @Sunstone and @Polymath257 may be collaborating in an attempt to do so.Do you think science tries to explain God and the mysteries of life through subliminal messages in a similar way that religion tries to explain it?
I have walked away from science and religion and formed my own opinions based on the science and religion that I have read. It doesn't say that that was the scientists intent. I'm just asking people's opinions about itWhat makes you think science tries to explain god?
Do you think science tries to explain God and the mysteries of life through subliminal messages in a similar way that religion tries to explain it?
Was Darwin a philosopher then? I'm not being sarcastic I'm being seriousNo. Science has no interest in any claimed god because no god belief us falsifiable
Well I guess Darwin wasn't really being subliminal in the first place so that's kind of a mute pointNo. Science has no interest in any claimed god because no god belief us falsifiable
Was Darwin a philosopher then? I'm not being sarcastic I'm being serious
Yeah you may have missed the part where I was asking about the mysteries of life but I realize that Darwin wasn't subliminal like you have statedI don't even see the relevance of the question
Darwin was not particularly religious even though he believed in a god. He was well qualified in biology and geology.
His work on evolution was based on his observations and has mostly been validated.
Yeah you may have missed the part where I was asking about the mysteries of life but I realize that Darwin wasn't subliminal like you have stated
No.Do you think science tries to explain God and the mysteries of life through subliminal messages in a similar way that religion might try to explain it?
So the church wants us to believe the Bible verbatim?No.
Science does not try to explain the human concept of God. Rather it works to explain (as openly and plainly as possible) that which is real in the world/universe.
I should also point out that religion and the church’s attempts to explain God (or the divine of any form) are far from subliminal.
Oh goodness no. That book (as with the Torah and the Quran, and just about any written religious manifesto) have far too many self-contradictions. Usually any church (we’ll discuss the Christian one here as you seem to be focusing on it) is a human construct founded upon a religion, but the instructions/teachings from the humans in the church are just their own personal (and ever changeable) opinions about what important takeaways they think that the followers/masses should be focusing on that week. They are not subliminal or even subtle about it.So the church wants us to believe the Bible verbatim?
Do you think science tries to explain God and the mysteries of life through subliminal messages in a similar way that religion might try to explain it?
Do you think science tries to explain God and the mysteries of life through subliminal messages in a similar way that religion might try to explain it?