• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Special Pleading and the PoE (Part 2)

samtonga43

samtonga43

Well-Known Member
Φᅠᅠ said:
He may well argue that this sort of subjective knowledge isn't different from those derived from doxastic practices such as sense perception. I know I'm seeing this computer right know in front of me because my senses tell me so. Therefore, this subjective information may be called knowledge. Likewise, his alleged experience of his deity may be called knowledge if it is received through his alleged sensus divinitatis.
Click to expand...
Yes, I also know that my computer is in front of me right now. But is this not objective knowledge?

It seems to me that if:
A. says, "I have has 'inner knowledge' that Jesus is God Incarnate",
and
B. says, "I have 'inner knowledge' that God is not triune", then these statements cannot both be true.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top