• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Socialist Bernie Sanders won't even pay his own staff a 'living' wage.

Neutral Name

Neutral Name

Active Member
Nowhere Man said:
There are no Democrats anymore.
Click to expand...

Oo, that's upsetting. I first voted for Jimmy Carter. That's how old I am. And I didn't hate the first George Bush even though I am usually a Democrat. Tell me more about why you don't think that there are any Democrats now.
 
Spirit of Light

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
@Nowhere Man
Answer me this. Why did the military send all fighterjets away from New York at the day of the 9/11 Attack? Why did they not stop the airplanes?
May it be that they knew about the attack. And why was the twin tower full of thermite? Why did they find Atta's passport non damaged laying on top of the rubble? Would it not have burned up?
 
P

pearl

Well-Known Member
Labourwave said:
Yes, because the US had zero presence in the Middle East up until then and totally didn't do anything to **** off people in the region.
Click to expand...

We had our military bases there after Kuwait. A presence which supposedly irked bin Ladin.
 
Twilight Hue

Twilight Hue

Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Amanaki said:
@Nowhere Man
Answer me this. Why did the military send all fighterjets away from New York at the day of the 9/11 Attack? Why did they not stop the airplanes?
May it be that they knew about the attack. And why was the twin tower full of thermite? Why did they find Atta's passport non damaged laying on top of the rubble? Would it not have burned up?
Click to expand...
I'm not that privy to that particular conspiracy. That would be so big it's almost impossible that there wouldn't be a whistleblower with a conscience somewhere to put a stop to it.

I find it difficult to believe there would be that many traitors in one specific area who wouldn't say anything if perchance the conspiracy had any validity.
 
Spirit of Light

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
Nowhere Man said:
I'm not that privy to that particular conspiracy. That would be so big it's almost impossible that there wouldn't be a whistleblower with a conscience somewhere to put a stop to it.

I find it difficult to believe there would be that many traitors in one specific area who wouldn't say anything if perchance the conspiracy had any validity.
Click to expand...
Thank you for your answer
 
Neutral Name

Neutral Name

Active Member
sun rise said:
That's a very good question and one I've not decided for myself. Right now I'm leaning Warren or Harris but have plenty of time before the primary election to decide.
Click to expand...

Yes, they both sound good and thank you for supporting females. What about Cory Booker. I think he could hold his own. I think that is what we need, someone strong and vocal.
 
metis

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
I really like Booker, but at this time I still feel that Biden has the best chance of unseating Trump.
 
Shad

Shad

Veteran Member
Nowhere Man said:
Called their complaints of poverty wages and long hours "inappropriate" as clearly, it's breaking a cardinal rule to make a good socialist look bad.

Bernie Sanders defends campaign staff salaries after accusations of 'poverty wages'

It's the prime example of what socialist Democrats do. Expect it.

Lie and swindle people with no intention of keeping any promises, because there's really nothing in it for socialist Bernie Sanders that benefits himself.

What an ungrateful staff. They should know socialist Bernie Sanders would care of them on the same premise that he said he would take care of the nation with living wages and proper Healthcare.
It's just someday, not today.

Yeaaaaa...... The perfect example of a man who does for his own, what he promises to others.

Welcome to Democrat Socialism. The way of the future.
Click to expand...

Said it before, will say it again. He is a champagne socialist
 
Shad

Shad

Veteran Member
Amanaki said:
Why?
There have been a lot of good democratic presidents then republicans. Just look at Bush senior and junior. And Trump. All of them bad presidents for America and for world peace
Click to expand...

Lincoln.... numbers vs policy.
 
Audie

Audie

Veteran Member
Diana Montgomery said:
The dictionary told me that socialism is "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole." That would be, to me, similar to giving employees shares in a company which is done. I don't see a problem with this. The only problem would be can people excel if they have the ability-the capitalist system? That can be either good or bad. People should be able to move ahead if they have the capability but they shouldn't be able to monopolize. So, I'm kind of down the middle on that.
Click to expand...

Ah, the dread radical middle. Daring to advocate
for the status quo. :D
 
Shad

Shad

Veteran Member
Diana Montgomery said:
The dictionary told me that socialism is "a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole." That would be, to me, similar to giving employees shares in a company which is done. I don't see a problem with this. The only problem would be can people excel if they have the ability-the capitalist system? That can be either good or bad. People should be able to move ahead if they have the capability but they shouldn't be able to monopolize. So, I'm kind of down the middle on that.
Click to expand...

It is not a share but that no one hold an unequal share. For example lets say I started a business with my own money and loans. I own 100% of the company. Let say I hire 3 employees. Via socialism they would get an equal share in the company. Yet none of those 3 put their money into the company. The 3 workers are gaining more than they put in. Socialism is ignoring that money represent labour as it is still stuck in the 19th century.
 
P

pearl

Well-Known Member
Audie said:
Did you ever read Bin Ladin's "letter to America"?
Click to expand...

No, but checked it out and among the list was the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia,

I assume the land had a special. sacred? meaning for him and our presence there was a kind of sacrilege.
 
Audie

Audie

Veteran Member
pcarl said:
No, but checked it out and among the list was the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia,

I assume the land had a special. sacred? meaning for him and our presence there was a kind of sacrilege.
Click to expand...

Among them, yes. Not the only, or the number one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top