*Paul* said:
What messengers have been sent to England though for example let alone other countries? I can't see any reason why the message of Islam is any more clear than that of the Hare Krishnas in the u.k. To the average person here in england which is mostly secular or nominaly christian there is no reason to adapt islam over any other religion there is no clear messenger certainly none speaking today.
All those prophets were sent to humanity before Mohammed "peace be upon him" and prophet Mohammed was the last one, but the difference is that the pervious prophets were sent to a specific people in a specific time with a specific message unlike prophet Mohammed who was sent to all human beings as whole till the day of judgement. Allah won't send a prophet to each village and house in your country dear Paul. He already sent prophet Mohammed.
This is only "well known" to muslims, and is no proof to the Saturday or Sunday people. What is well known to Christians is that many decievers will come and lead many astray, there is no reason for us to believe that mohammed was not one such deciever.
Why can't he be the one?
I'll assume that you are aware of this verse:
1:20
And he confessed, and denied not; but confessed, I am not the Christ.
1:21
And they asked him, What then? Art thou Elias? and he saith, I am not. Art thou that prophet? And he answered, No.
and:
1:25
And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if thou be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that prophet.
If we look up any Bible which has a concordance or cross-references, the we will find in the marginal note where the words
"the Prophet", or
"that Prophet" occur in John 1:25, that these words refer to the prophecy of Deuteronomy 18:15 and 18. And that
'that prophet' - 'the prophet like Moses' - "LIKE UNTO THEE" and all reffer to the comforter which is the holy spirit. So, this is spirit "the comforter" is a prophet and the prove is:
The same John, who is supposed to have authored the Gospel bearing his name, also penned three more Epistles which are also part of the Christian Bible. Amazingly he has used the same terminology of "Holy Spirit" for "Holy Prophet."
Beloved, believe not every Spirit, but try the Spirits whether they
are of God; because many false Prophets are gone out into the World.
(HOLY BIBLE) 1 John 4:1
Give me one reason which make you believe that Mohammed is a deciever.
Let us analyze this, for instance, i have all the right to say that there is no prophet after Mohammed because he said so but you have no reason to deny that a prophet might come after Jesus Christ.
In order to deny anyone who claim to be "that prophet", so you must prove that he didn't fulfill the prophicies in the bible which described him.
Therefore, we must go and analyze whether he is the one or not "based on the bible" which described a prophet who shall come after Jesus according to the OT and NT.
"I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren,
like unto thee,
and I will put my words in his mouth;
and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him." Deuteronomy 18:18
many Christians would say this is God is telling Moses that he will send
Jesus and also Muslims will say he is
Mohamed but how we can know which one of them is this prophet.
first of all, the one mentioned in this verse supposed to fulfill 4 criterias according to the verse:
1- God will raise this prophet from thier brethren (the Jews).
2- Like unto Moses ( like Moses ).
3- God will put his words in his mouth.
4- this prophet shall speak unto them all that God shall command him.
Now, if you can't prove for me that Mohammed can't be the one according to these 4 criterias so you have no right to believe that he is a deciever.
Needless to say yours is not the Christian understanding of the texts involved.
I'm interested more in your understanding not the Christian understanding in this issue. Otherwise, we can't go forward if we kept believing in what we have been told to believe in as i said before. If you are really looking for the truth, as i do so, so you we should look in the scripture together and examine it and i won't force my understanding upon you but i'll just ask and analyze it with you till we reach to a conclusion based in what we find out through our discussion but not in what i want you to believe in as you think.
The simple answer to this is that mohammed considered Moses a prophet and carried over some of the practices into his new religion also having a better chance of bringing over christians and jews with him. I guess i didn't need to say that.
Can you prove that he was looking into the bible (which wasn't arabic at that time) and did as you mentioned?
even if there was an arabic bible at that time so he won't be able to read it simply because he is
an illiterate.
"And the book is delivered to him
that is not learned, saying,
Read this, I pray thee:
and he saith, I am not learned."
Isaiah 29:12 (KJV)
When Gabriel said to Mohammed read, Mohammed "peace be upon him" told him that he can't read, why? because he is illiterate and
he is not learned.
That's a fulfill for the prophecy, then after 3 times of asking him to READ, Gabriel taught him to read in the name of Allah.
'Read in the name of your Lord, who has created
(all that exists) has created man from a clot.
Read! And your Lord is the Most Generous." (Quran: Surah 96).
Now, before you start preparing yourself to answer and maybe defend your pervious unjustfied belief in prophet Mohammed, keep in mind that this is not a competition between who win and who will lose but it's just about a discussion who will lead either of us to the truth if we really want to.
when i show you the things written therein you will tell me it got corrupted and so can't be trusted as the koran says.
Impossible. The Quran never mentioned even once that the previous word of God can't be trusted as you claim. God ordered us to believe in the pervious scriptures as we believe in the Quran because all of them are the word of God.
As a whole is important. And involves a lot more than Matthew Mark Luke and John. But it's 1400 hundred years since Mohammed was died. Why should he be believed now?
I didn't get what you mean in here, can you please elaborate. Do you mean just because Mohammed died so he is no more a prophet?
So wouldn't it be a human kindness not to spread the message so that everyone gets a "special deal on Judgement day".
Nope, I believe that a risk you won't take.
Islam is not somthing which one must escape from but rather, it's a true happeness for the true believers who were waiting for prophet Mohammed to appear and it's the belief which will rescue those people who are confused in this life and have no reason to "in their mind" to live. It's simply, a great oprtunity to live happy in this life. So if you asked me about being kind to people, it will definitely be through my behavior which my faith planted in me and encouraged me to act upon. Islam came to save humanity, my friend. It's the feel of being near God and there is no true happeness without believing in him.
I had a private discussion with F.V.M about this before and was most intrigued, i felt however that she had rejected a false idea about what Christians believe.
I guess she can answer you for that.
I could provide with many reverse testimonies, but for the majority of people who do not live in muslim countries Islam means nothing because they have had no clear message or messenger.
What about rejecting the truth after finding it?
What do you say about that?
I feel that perhaps we are getting closer to an answer and i look forward to FVMs thought out response. One problem is that discussions like this just raise more and more questions and it is hard to stay on topic
Don't worry about that, we still in topic and we will try to be so as well as much as we can.
particularly when you feel like you want to defend your faith. I am finding this aspect quite difficult and i thank you for the effort you have made to stay on topic.
Thnaks for your politeness and unaggressive manor it goes a long way.
We will continue soon no doubt if the Lord tarries, may Your eyes be opened before that day. ( I am wishing a good thing for you not being confrontational here )
Well, you have the right to defend your faith and your beliefs as long as that doesn't involve rejecting things just because it doesn't fit with your background and what you have been taught. We will try "God willing" to reason well and discuss and we ask God to help us and guide us to all the truth. May God open our heart and minds to the truth, Amen.