Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Beat me to it!We already have one; English
And if they did, should it be an existing language, or one a group of linguistic scientists 'create' which is easier to learn, yet still expressive?
If Esperanto became common, its rules & words would evolve in a messy fashion too.Esperanto is kind of how English would be if it were far more latinized than it is.
English already kind of is used as an international language, the problem is that the language, frankly, sucks. It constantly breaks its own rules, has verb conjugation that often makes no sense, and to top it off, native speakers often can't speak it correctly.
Well we kinda have English ._.
There are worse according to people I know who learned it as a 2nd language. Chinese, Japanese, Russian & others are tougher.English is one of the most difficult languages apparently.
Meh, Esperanto. Aux, not Uni.
There are worse according to people I know who learned it as a 2nd language. Chinese, Japanese, Russian & others are tougher.
English already kind of is used as an international language, ... and to top it off, native speakers often can't speak it correctly.
We speak it properly, in Oz. All you other folks spend far too much time trying to pronounce vowels, and whatever. Waste of time.