Scottish Court Upholds Boris Johnson!

[Bob Jones]

Reported by Reuters:Judge Raymond Doherty said the question was not a matter for judicial interference and was a political issue which should be judged by parliament and the electorate. He said it was up to parliament to" decide when it sat".
Bleeding heart fascist liberals presented a petition to whom they thought was a safe court seeking to nullify PM Johnson`s decision was dealt a set back with the Scottish court dismissing the petition.

WOW! The judicial system sometimes does work!

 

[oldbadger]

Reported by Reuters:Judge Raymond Doherty said the question was not a matter for judicial interference and was a political issue which should be judged by parliament and the electorate. He said it was up to parliament to" decide when it sat".
Bleeding heart fascist liberals presented a petition to whom they thought was a safe court seeking to nullify PM Johnson`s decision was dealt a set back with the Scottish court dismissing the petition.

WOW! The judicial system sometimes does work!

So you liked the judgement.
The trick is, to appreciate judgements objectively.

 

[Altfish]

It is amazing how our courts are brilliant when the decision go in their favour (as this always was) but traitorous when they go against.

Fickle are the right wing.

 

[Wandering Monk]

It is amazing how our courts are brilliant when the decision go in their favour (as this always was) but traitorous when they go against.

Fickle are the right wing.

You really believe that only right wing are subject to this hypocrisy?

 

[Estro Felino]

It is amazing how our courts are brilliant when the decision go in their favour (as this always was) but traitorous when they go against.

Fickle are the right wing.

Same thing as for referendums..when the decision doesn't go in leftists' favor, they find them despicable.

 

[Bob Jones]

So you liked the judgement.
The trick is, to appreciate judgements objectively.

I am flabbergasted!

 

[Bob Jones]

It is amazing how our courts are brilliant when the decision go in their favour (as this always was) but traitorous when they go against.

Fickle are the right wing.

Good point!

 

[Bob Jones]

Same thing as for referendums..when the decision doesn't go in leftists' favor, they find them despicable.

Another good point!

 

[Altfish]

Same thing as for referendums..when the decision doesn't go in leftists' favor, they find them despicable.

No, we were sold unicorns and golden uplands; not No Deal

 

[Nakosis]

Reported by Reuters:Judge Raymond Doherty said the question was not a matter for judicial interference and was a political issue which should be judged by parliament and the electorate. He said it was up to parliament to" decide when it sat".
Bleeding heart fascist liberals presented a petition to whom they thought was a safe court seeking to nullify PM Johnson`s decision was dealt a set back with the Scottish court dismissing the petition.

WOW! The judicial system sometimes does work!

Good, IMO, for the judicial system to stay out of politics.
They are supposed to in the US but somehow we get judges marked either as conservative or liberal.

Judges should make an unbiased decisions on whatever current laws are enacted.

 

[Bob Jones]

Good, IMO, for the judicial system to stay out of politics.
They are supposed to in the US but somehow we get judges marked either as conservative or liberal.

Judges should make an unbiased decisions on whatever current laws are enacted.

The original intent was to have judges that would be a neutral arbitrator of the law

 

[Brickjectivity]

You really believe that only right wing are subject to this hypocrisy?

It does seem that there is some bi partisan argumentation doesn't it? Yeah, people are team players when it comes to politics, and BS is part of the game. I wish it were not so. Soft skinned people rarely make it through the political process. I think a lot of people avoid political decisions purely because its so unpleasant to discuss issues.

 

[oldbadger]

I am flabbergasted!

Judges don't judge politically.
Judges judge on legality.

 

[shmogie]

Good, IMO, for the judicial system to stay out of politics.
They are supposed to in the US but somehow we get judges marked either as conservative or liberal.

Judges should make an unbiased decisions on whatever current laws are enacted.

Sadly, since the left strongly believes the end justifies the means, the Left in the US has always used the courts and their judges to get their way.

They bypass the will of the people, and we get the will of their judges.

Now, fearing that finally their lock hold on the Supreme court is changing, they want to change the court, in their favor.

 

[Altfish]

Sadly, since the left strongly believes the end justifies the means, the Left in the US has always used the courts and their judges to get their way.

They bypass the will of the people, and we get the will of their judges.

Now, fearing that finally their lock hold on the Supreme court is changing, they want to change the court, in their favor.

Whereas the right has money to buy access to politicians to bribe them and get their way. Ladies and gentlemen, as an example I give you the NRA.

 

[Twilight Hue]

Reported by Reuters:Judge Raymond Doherty said the question was not a matter for judicial interference and was a political issue which should be judged by parliament and the electorate. He said it was up to parliament to" decide when it sat".
Bleeding heart fascist liberals presented a petition to whom they thought was a safe court seeking to nullify PM Johnson`s decision was dealt a set back with the Scottish court dismissing the petition.

WOW! The judicial system sometimes does work!

 

[shmogie]

Whereas the right has money to buy access to politicians to bribe them and get their way. Ladies and gentlemen, as an example I give you the NRA.

Are you kidding ? Planned Parenthood, anti gun lobby´s like Bloombergs, etc., etc. Don´t spend any money to influence politicians, right ?

 

[Augustus]

Now, fearing that finally their lock hold on the Supreme court is changing

When was the last time there was a "liberal" majority on the SC?

 

[shmogie]

When was the last time there was a "liberal" majority on the SC?

The Warren court. Yet an alleged ¨ swing vote" that is reliably liberal is what it is,

 

[Altfish]

Are you kidding ? Planned Parenthood, anti gun lobby´s like Bloombergs, etc., etc. Don´t spend any money to influence politicians, right ?

Compared to the pro lobby, no.

In the UK, the right says "Why do the left always go to the streets?" the reason is that they don't have the 'old school tie' network.