-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Scientists create living eating and growing machines...
- Thread starter Dell
- Start date
Thats it, get em cleary! Get is ***! Lol
Serious question:
What the hell is wrong with you? You're supposedly a 39 year old adult.
We Never Know
No Slack
I accept life formed naturally from chemicals.
You believe god created a fully formed man from chemicals.
Chemicals are the winner.
Last edited:
We Never Know
No Slack
Read up on abiogenesis. It isn't about nothing.
Jollybear
Hey
I let my inner child come out.
No one is saying nothing did it and certainly no one is saying that a philosophical concept like naturalism did it.
Your argument is so misinformed that it's not even wrong: It's plain nonsensical.
You still see this as a contest of some sort. If so, you've yet to even enter the starting line.
The process and it's initiation are not understood.
Ask again in 20 years.
Wrong place for it. This is a scientific debate thread.
Or the right place if you wish to convey to everyone that you're basically a joke.
Jollybear
Hey
Theres no wrong place to be yourself.
The only wrong place is the place that dont let you be yourself.
I guess what I said didn't register. I said it's fine to be yourself.
Jollybear
Hey
I cant get back that fare to find my debate with Christine. So, youl have to take my wird for it.
But hey, i showed you richard dawkins said it.
I'm saying i won't. Because you're unreliable in this context. **mod edit**
You lied about Dawkins and Krauss(which you keep mispelling.) I have every expectation that you're lying about her too.
Repeating a lie after having been caught? How intelligent do you consider that to be?
I bet this is the cause of your misunderstanding:
A Universe from Nothing - Wikipedia
Maybe you should READ the content instead of the TITLE.
Last edited by a moderator:
Jollybear
Hey
Dawkins did say it.
Last edited by a moderator:
No he did not. Repeating this won't make it more true.
Your god actually said that you don't know what you're talking about.
"Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour"
(He literally says something had to be there)
Jollybear
Hey
Thou shalt not be in denial. Lol
I watched the video. You're in denial.
