Trump still could not change the light bulb, "I know nothing."
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Scientific American Backs a Presidential Candidate
- Thread starter Fool
- Start date
Trump still could not change the light bulb, "I know nothing."
It's my favourite part of Biden. I'm generally unimpressed.
"We all live in a Biden submarine....a Biden submarine...a Biden submarine...!"
Harris is on firm ground.
It's a common problem that Presidents
prefer law school to engineering school.
And voters prefer sky fairy worshipers
to atheists.
Well, I'm not ranking their ignorance.
Just standing back in amazement...at a distance.
That is one of the most reasonable positions I've ever read on RF.
I sincerely apologise, and will try to be more controversial in the future...lol
That kinda holds true even over here, despite our much lower levels of religiosity. We have had one atheist PM, but mostly not speaking about religion, with occasional references to God seems the playbook.
Our more religious PMs (and we've had a few recently) hold to this as well, although they'll commonly make more definitive statements about God when playing to certain audiences (refer Scott Morrison at Hillsong).
Mr Spinkles
Mr
“Buying the endorsement”. Project much? This is Donald Trump’s forte, see one example below.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I dont get baited into stuff like that. Even from Trump shilling stuff like this out.
Mr Spinkles
Mr
Biden occasionally jumbles his words.
But Trump’s thoughts are jumbled. And incurable.
There is a difference.
Mr Spinkles
Mr
That’s good that his shilling doesn’t cause you to buy his products.
But you do seem to ignore it, and project it onto others like Biden, without any evidence. Why do you do that?
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Then it runs into Red October.
Mr Spinkles
Mr
Please provide evidence / specific examples of what you mean by saying Biden doesn’t “know” science.
I’m sure most presidents don’t know how a nuclear submarine works. They don’t have to. They just have to know enough not to make moronic judgments and to be aware that there are experts who know more than they do.
Trump cannot do that. Many examples have been provided on this thread.
So please provide examples to support your pseudo-intellectual false equivalence that Biden is ignorant of science in any way comparable to Trump.
I’m listening. Maybe there are examples I wasn’t aware of - this is not a rhetorical question, just a question.
Dang, touched a nerve, did I?
Mr Spinkles
Mr
Not being Trump is everyone’s best quality right now. That’s not just a Biden thing. Tell Republicans to stop setting the bar so low and elevating malevolent simpletons like Dr Trump.
Mr Spinkles
Mr
Nothing, huh?
Your approach....
"your pseudo-intellectual false equivalence"
...suggests having "The Truth", but no tolerance for other views.
Mr Spinkles
Mr
Biden said “iridescent” instead of “incandescent” light bulb.
Trump flat out refuses to accept the observed path of a hurricane or the danger of a virus that has killed more Americans than every war since Korea, combined.
See? They are BOTH anti science. Being objective and nonpartisan means putting a blindfold on, like Lady Justice, before you weigh two candidates on your scales ... and KEEPING that blindfold on after the measurement, so you can’t discern any meaningful results, either.