Does not document anything, and if human nature(?) you cannot be selective of one person nor the other.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Scientific American Backs a Presidential Candidate
- Thread starter Fool
- Start date
Does not document anything, and if human nature(?) you cannot be selective of one person nor the other.
Trump is a moron. The above citation is not meaningful in the context of what Trump describe corona virus pandemic over time.
Last edited:
The egregious negative attitude toward science by the Trump administration is a scientific issue.
exchemist
Veteran Member
Emotion doesn't come into it. Trump, objectively, attacks science.
- He undermines it (e.g climate change),
- He parachutes in people friendly to his politics to influence what are supposed to be scientific organisations (e.g. Caputo),
- He promotes notions that science says are unsupported (e.g. hydroxychloroquine),
- He makes stuff up and pretends it is science (e.g. bleach, light to treat Covid 19).
- He tries to manipulate the statistics by which people measure progress (e.g. Covid, again)
It is a matter of cold logic, then, to conclude that Trump is a menace to science.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
"Lesser of two evils."
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
Big deal.
Even if he does, whats Trump going to do?
Replace all scientific institutions with hotel complexes and churches?
The difference between 2 evils appears
murkier than it did in 2016 (IMO).
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
Far better than a president pushing an outright anti-science agenda. You can list all of Biden's flaws, of which there many, yet there still no contest because none of it changes the fact that Trump has been nothing but a disasterous dumpster fire.
Yet again....
A candidate whose best quality is being not the other.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
The alternative doesn't hold much promise either.
Guess everyone is screwed all the way to Sunday for the coming 4 years.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
How could you not understand why a science magizine would support science over anti-science? The only "bias" science has is scientific vs. unscientific.
Father Heathen
Veteran Member
If I'm forced to eat a **** sandwich, of course I'll choose a little bite-sized one over a massive one.
Twilight Hue
Twilight, not bright nor dark, good nor bad.
I wonder if we could get separation of science and state implementated?
One does not need to 'know,' but to provide the leadership to consult and work with scientist to deal with scientific issues. Obama and Biden have and will do this by the evidence.
Trump has not provided the leadership and opposes science.
. . . if Trump is elected were screwed big time.
Not with the Evangelical Christians dominating Trump's cabinet, Pence and the Senate.
Murky defines Trump. The overwhelming problems with Trump, and his allegances with Evangelical Christians and Putin are devastating.
That and the concentration camps.
... and now secret police snatching people off the street and credible allegations of eugenics.
At this point, voting for Joe "competent but disappointing" Biden is a moral imperative.