One is simply wrong.
There exists no limbo of Agnosticism here, it simply is not in the realm of science. We are misusing the tool of science by applying the scientific method where it has no relevance at all. Right? Please
There are several scientists, some atheists, who have admitted that a laissez-faire God cannot be ruled out. The cause for the universe if fair game for scientific investigation. How could you argue that it's not? The total lack of evidence either way is a superb definition of a limbo of agnosticism.
Unable to make declarations?
How does that work seeing it is in and of itself a declaration?
When a cop has no evidence but a dead body, what does he say?
What does evidence have to do with making declarations?
This here forum is plum full of declarations made with little to no evidence.....
"We have a dead body with no ID and no idea how he came to be dead," is a declaration. "We have a universe with no idea how it came to exist", is as well.