Heyo
Veteran Member
A good heist plan would have taken that into account.I think the ballot box(es) were taken away to be secured so not available to the mob.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
A good heist plan would have taken that into account.I think the ballot box(es) were taken away to be secured so not available to the mob.
They didn't get there quick enough apparently. A female was astute enough to realise they might be a target - can't remember who it was though, but I read about it some news article.A good heist plan would have taken that into account.
Good guess. We might know someday, maybe sooner than we expect. But it would be surreal if the ballots were not on their list. It's clear that a few individuals declared their intention to kill Pelosi, Pence, or others. But I have seen no evidence yet they were part of an organized group with such an objective on 1/6.
So far, the most concerning report I myself have heard about the planned objectives of any of the insurrectionists comes from a staff member who claims to have witnessed a group bypass the route to Jim Clyburn's public office without any pause or hesitation, and instead take the route that leads to Jim Clyburn's secret office. Whatever happened, it's a fact his secret office was somehow 'discovered', entered, and trashed. Clyburn is the third ranking Democrat in the House, and his secret office is said to be off the beaten path. Not somewhere you'd be likely to end up unless you knew its location.
Tinge of right-wing bias shining through here too (Your previous remarks).
Same thing they did the first time. Protest - the vast majority peacefully.
Was there a previous inauguration with
marauders in matching outfits burning cars,
smashing windows etc?
I don't know.
Considering how the thermostat has
been turned up during the past four years,
I am inclined to think it would have been
far more extensive.
FORTUNATELY we don't get to find out.
Turns out when you kick off your campaign by stereotyping Mexicans as criminals, promise to ban all Muslims from entering the country, then promote violence at your rallies against protestors, constantly wink-wink-nod-nod to white supremacists, etc., yeah, that turns the thermostat up.
I agree, I'm thankful we no longer have to find out what else happens with him in office.
Which loopy left-wing views seem the most abhorrent to you?Right wing biss...
I would agree with, vote for if I were
American, some " right wing' issues.
Some, probably more, left wing.
If I did not disagree with loopy
leftists here, I'd have to be as
deranged as they, and nobody to
argue with.
Or no, there's comparably extremist,
righties, I could continue to disgree
with them.
Which loopy left-wing views seem the most abhorrent to you?
As an immigrant to the US at the time,
I was not happy with any anti immigrant
talk, and under t, immigration is way down
As for the stereotyping of Mexicans, I did
not read it as you did.
There is a huge element of criminal
activity along the border. I rode for miles
In border country with an attorney friend,
who got a call with yet another case to
represent, as we were driving. Drug smuggler,
most of them forced to carry the drugs.
I learned a lot about how bad it is.
My take was that with trumps usual lack of precision, to put it mildly, he could be taken
as saying "they all" are bad actors.
Denying that there is a huge criminal
problem on the southern border that
simply has not been addressed in any effective
way is as unrealistic as to say all Mexicans are rapists.
The Muslim ban was about entry from
any country noted as a source of terrorists
until some system-that sure failed 911-
was in place.
What seems to these eyes so unfortunate
is that ideas like these, sensible and necessary
at their core, had the terrible time as their
spokesman.
As for heating up, " now the impeachment
begins" and riots were a left wing thing.
Thanks to all who voted against him.
No one serious - certainly no Dem politician I'm aware of, including Biden - claims there are no problems at the border. Drug running is quite a real issue. Refugees fleeing from Central American cartels and rampant violence is also a real issue. As usual, Trump's way of approaching it was by winking to racists with an ugly stereotype. Thus, reasonable people understandably responded to his gross rhetoric with...WHAT THE ****.
Except that isn't what he said. He promised a complete ban on Muslims entering the country - a beautiful piece of red meat for the far-right, who view Islam as fundamentally incompatible with "The West."
It's been 20 years since 911. We have vastly tighter security, even before Trump, than we did pre-911.
As has been debated and demonstrated ad nauseum around here for months, the vast majority of anti-Trump protests have been peaceful.
Would you have...? Who would you have voted for?
Some quite reasonable and bright economists seem to have concluded that Capitalism, as is, is just not viable for the future, especially when it tends to work against any efforts to combat the damage to the planet that we all, perhaps inadvertently, are doing. That for me is why the leftist views should be taken seriously, in that we have to change from the all-consuming mentality that seems to be the basis of such. Unfortunately we have a lead nation geared to oppose anything like left-wing thinking, even if many other countries see the problems ahead.I would not put it that way, abhorrent.
Far left economic ideas are, I think, foolish and dangerous.
Some are just stupid, like "they" instead of he or she.
Right wing evangelist stuff is among the worst of all.
Some quite reasonable and bright economists seem to have concluded that Capitalism, as is, is just not viable for the future, especially when it tends to work against any efforts to combat the damage to the planet that we all, perhaps inadvertently, are doing. That for me is why the leftist views should be taken seriously, in that we have to change from the all-consuming mentality that seems to be the basis of such. Unfortunately we have a lead nation geared to oppose anything like left-wing thinking, even if many other countries see the problems ahead.
Don't expect me to explain (see later) - apart from the economic crashes that might wipe out ten years of stability, or the enormous wealth inequalities that seem to promote feelings of unfairness (and tendencies towards crime), and the notion that growth seems to be all that matters (despite what it will do to the planet), and how it seems to also promote corruption in politics (money being thrown at it - see the USA recently) - I hate politics and economics, so just pick up what I notice in the news and over time, but as I stated, some seem to know better than I to foresee changes or we will be in real trouble. Maybe it just needs better controls, but there doesn't seem to be much impetus towards such. I'm sure this says much that many who criticise modern Capitalism would agree with.Capitalism as is?
Not viable?
Prease exprain.
Capitalism says its death notice is premature.Don't expect me to explain (see later) - apart from the economic crashes that might wipe out ten years of stability, or the enormous wealth inequalities that seem to promote feelings of unfairness (and tendencies towards crime), and the notion that growth seems to be all that matters (despite what it will do to the planet), and how it seems to also promote corruption in politics (money being thrown at it - see the USA recently) - I hate politics and economics, so just pick up what I notice in the news and over time, but as I stated, some seem to know better than I to foresee changes or we will be in real trouble. Maybe it just needs better controls, but there doesn't seem to be much impetus towards such. I'm sure this says much that many who criticise modern Capitalism would agree with.
Monthly Review | Capitalism Has Failed—What Next?
Someone with more interest and knowledge might want to discuss this but have neither.
That is sadly true. We are stuck with a dysfunctional system.Capitalism says its death notice is premature.
It doesn't see a competitor anywhere.
Um. Everything is based on Capitalism.Don't expect me to explain (see later) - apart from the economic crashes that might wipe out ten years of stability, or the enormous wealth inequalities that seem to promote feelings of unfairness (and tendencies towards crime), and the notion that growth seems to be all that matters (despite what it will do to the planet), and how it seems to also promote corruption in politics (money being thrown at it - see the USA recently) - I hate politics and economics, so just pick up what I notice in the news and over time, but as I stated, some seem to know better than I to foresee changes or we will be in real trouble. Maybe it just needs better controls, but there doesn't seem to be much impetus towards such. I'm sure this says much that many who criticise modern Capitalism would agree with.
Monthly Review | Capitalism Has Failed—What Next?
Someone with more interest and knowledge might want to discuss this but have neither.
How many goats does it take to barter for an Xbox?That is sadly true. We are stuck with a dysfunctional system.
And people are still too comfortable in it to start try something else. (And every attempt would be attacked by the capitalists, so it would be really hard to try.)
Not my subject of interest to answer this, but presumably something a bit more controlled so as to benefit the majority rather than those who seem to make money from virtually any circumstance or get into power so as to effect such. I suspect if people had more of a stake in what they produced then we might have less conflict, and also, that we took the life-cycle of products into account when selling them - as to how the cost of recycling and such was more integrated than just being an add-on, and given some thought after we have created a mess. But humans don't seem to have arrived at such understanding yet. So an economic system that didn't build up debt for future generations to deal with and at the same time one that made life fairer for all - if we actually wanted such a society. It may not be possible to achieve but the dangers of carrying on as we are is quite evident.Um. Everything is based on Capitalism.
So what's the alternative?
Probably true, but some of those who know better than I seem to think it does need changing in some manner to make it less damaging for the planet. Not sure which is worse - population growth or our expectations as to how we would like to live. We all cannot live like most in the USA can (a nation with probably the highest consumption), and at the same time we cannot have such disparities in lifestyles without it producing the conflicts that often comes from such. So surely something has to change.Capitalism says its death notice is premature.
It doesn't see a competitor anywhere.