Right Wing Activist Warns of Armed Rebellion If Genuine Patriots Don't Win in 2022

[Wandering Monk]

The Party of Law and Order is becoming the Party of Insurrection.

Scott Lively Warns of 'Armed Rebellion' if 'Genuine Patriots' Don't Win the 2022 Elections | Right Wing Watch

 

[Revoltingest]

The Party of Law and Order is becoming the Party of Insurrection.

Scott Lively Warns of 'Armed Rebellion' if 'Genuine Patriots' Don't Win the 2022 Elections | Right Wing Watch

I shiver with anticipation.
Not.

 

[Nakosis]

The guy who claimed the Nazi party was the product of homosexuals?

 

[Vinayaka]

The guy who claimed the Nazi party was the product of homosexuals?

It wasn't?

 

[Kooky]

I shiver with anticipation.
Not.

Yea, it would have been really troubling if right-wing activists had ever attempted a coup to instate their preferred candidate, but as it is, Americans can sleep soundly knowing that such a thing would never come to pass.

 

[Wandering Monk]

It wasn't?

You know that Hitler was a vegetarian, right?

 

[sun rise]

Since the left are the "Genuine Patriots", watch out next year if we need to 'stop the steal'. We'll need to mandate recounts in any area where Republicans have a "majority" of votes. But no matter what, we won't have "regular tourists" visit Congress in order to "lobby" the members (with swords and nooses).

 

[tas8831]

The Party of Law and Order is becoming the Party of Insurrection.

Scott Lively Warns of 'Armed Rebellion' if 'Genuine Patriots' Don't Win the 2022 Elections | Right Wing Watch

I do so enjoy the fact that so many of these right-wing fascist thugs seem to believe that macho fantasy stereotypes they have about the left. Their unwarranted confidence would be there undoing.

 

[Jose Fly]

I hope law enforcement is taking this stuff seriously. The last time right-wing Trumpists openly planned and plotted an attack, it was largely ignored and we ended up with the Jan. 6 insurrection attempt. Maybe LE has learned a lesson.

I fully expect some of these domestic terrorists to at least try to commit some sort of attack. Hopefully LE will be able to stop them before they actually pull it off, because otherwise innocent people may die.

 

[Revoltingest]

Yea, it would have been really troubling if right-wing activists had ever attempted a coup to instate their preferred candidate, but as it is, Americans can sleep soundly knowing that such a thing would never come to pass.

Jan 6 was a feckless attack. I've heard ravings from
the likes of the loony quoted in the OP for many decades.
You can worry about a coup. I won't.

 

[Jose Fly]

Jan 6 was a feckless attack. I've heard ravings from
the likes of the loony quoted in the OP for many decades.
You can worry about a coup. I won't.

I'm not worried about an actual, successful coup. I'm concerned about another attempted coup and/or attack from some of the Trump faithful.

IMO, it's only a matter of time before some of them try something.

 

[Revoltingest]

I'm not worried about an actual, successful coup. I'm concerned about another attempted coup and/or attack from some of the Trump faithful.

IMO, it's only a matter of time before some of them try something.

It makes sense for a continued vigil against
potentially violent extremists...these guys
& all others.

 

[Jose Fly]

It makes sense for a continued vigil against
potentially violent extremists...these guys
& all others.

Of course, but this is not a bothsiderism issue at the moment.

 

[Revoltingest]

Of course, but this is not a bothsiderism issue at the moment.

I offered the best policy to address the OP's loony.
And broadened it.
So you can take your "bothsiderism" & place it in nide klemfter.

 

[Jose Fly]

I offered the best policy to address the OP's loony.
And broadened it.
So you can take your "bothsiderism" & place it in nide klemfter.

Why specifically did it need broadened?

 

[Revoltingest]

Why specifically did it need broadened?

When I fully address the issue at hand,
this gives me license to broaden it.
Don't like it?
Uncomfortable addressing that some
of your ilk are potentially violent too?
Tough.

 

[Jose Fly]

When I fully address the issue at hand,
this gives me license to broaden it.
Don't like it?
Uncomfortable addressing that some
of your ilk are potentially violent too?
Tough.

Ah, so you were bothsidering the issue, exactly as I said.

 

[Revoltingest]

Ah, so you were bothsidering the issue, exactly as I said.

So you say.
But you misunderstand.
It seems want government to address only right wing threats.
You object to addressing all threats.
Tis good that you don't design public policy.
You fear Trumpies, but you offer no solution.

 

[Jose Fly]

So you say.
But you misunderstand.

Just quoting your own posts dude.

It seems want government to address only right wing threats.
You object to addressing all threats.

Of course I never said anything like that at all, so now you have a choice....apologize or double down on these lies.

Your choice.

 

[Revoltingest]

Of course I never said anything like that at all, so now you have a choice....apologize or double down on these lies.

Such hostility...tsk, tsk.
Your post vigorously objected to my proffered public
policy that addressed Trump related threats of violence.
Why? Because it should address all threats. Refusal
to address others is tacit approval. Your own words.