• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
I have completed
secondary school with the Gold Medal, Tartu University
with Cum Laude, and I have successfully published in
Physical Review E and European Physical Journal B.

The Process of reading scientific literature is a serious activity of the
brain. Therefore, it is inevitable to feel unease. Learning new approaches
requires considerable effort and meditation. Perhaps, you are giving me
no chance to be right. Imagine that I am right, and take the text at face
value. Why are there no unanimously accepted mistakes in the Sacred Texts?
Because the followers love their Sacred Texts. Try to love my text as well.
More love -- less mistakes.

There is no indication, that I have mistakes in the paper. Of course,
I highly doubt myself, but I am not sure, that I have made any mistakes.
I can not correct mistakes, if no mistakes are found yet.

Riemann hypothesis, the most beautiful hypothesis
 
Last edited:

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I have completed
secondary school with the Gold Medal, Tartu University
with Cum Laude, and I have successfully published in
Physical Review E and European Physical Journal B.

The Process of reading scientific literature is a serious activity of the
brain. Therefore, it is inevitable to feel unease. Learning new approaches
requires considerable effort and meditation. Perhaps, you are giving me
no chance to be right. Imagine that I am right, and take the text at face
value. Why are there no unanimously accepted mistakes in the Sacred Texts?
Because the followers love their Sacred Texts. Try to love my text as well.
More love -- less mistakes.

Riemann hypothesis, the most beautiful hypothesis
You're in the wrong arena.

You need to be out there where the real mathematicians and the real Field Medals and problem prizes are.

I'd feel more encouraged if you'd worked that out for yourself.
 

The Hammer

[REDACTED]
Premium Member
The Process of reading scientific literature is a serious activity of the
brain. Therefore, it is inevitable to feel unease. Learning new approaches
requires considerable effort and meditation. Perhaps, you are giving me
no chance to be right. Imagine that I am right, and take the text at face
value. Why are there no unanimously accepted mistakes in the Sacred Texts?
Because the followers love their Sacred Texts. Try to love my text as well.
More love -- less mistakes.

This quote is literally the exact same thing you posted on mathematicsforum.com, it didn't work there, it's not going to work here.

As the other poster from that forum said:

"If anyone knew the answers to those questions they'd have a Millennium Prize. Seeing as no one does for the Riemann hypothesis no one has the answer."

You're not answering the actual hypothesis at all. But I give you an A+ for effort.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
You're in the wrong arena.

You need to be out there where the real mathematicians and the real Field Medals and problem prizes are.

I'd feel more encouraged if you'd worked that out for yourself.
My father. My father has cursed me, he said: "the son does not mean anything."
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
You need to be out there where the real mathematicians and the real Field Medals and problem prizes are.
But the arXiv is not a public forum anymore. It is the place for top researches only, who are working for top places. I have not a pass to enter the club.
 

blü 2

Veteran Member
Premium Member
But the arXiv is not a public forum anymore. It is the place for top researches only, who are working for top places. I have not a pass to enter the club.
If you're right you belong in the big peer-reviewed maths mags, not in arXiv.

If you're not right, forget I spoke.
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
If you're right you belong in the big peer-reviewed maths mags, not in arXiv.
There is no indication, that I have mistakes in the proof of Riemann Hypothesis. Of course, I highly doubt myself, but I am not sure, that I have made any mistakes. I can not correct mistakes, if no mistakes are found yet. The journals are not interested, they say to me: go, learn math in university, start the career of mathematician, become famous professor, and then come back to us with your solutions.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
There is no indication, that I have mistakes in the proof of Riemann Hypothesis. Of course, I highly doubt myself, but I am not sure, that I have made any mistakes. I can not correct mistakes, if no mistakes are found yet. The journals are not interested, they say to me: go, learn math in university, start the career of mathematician, become famous professor, and then come back to us with your solutions.
I can't even fathom I going to say this, because it is so far away from what I normally do.

You are in denial...You do not understand that you are not a scientist but a man who wants his own name and person to be more known to people, than his work.
The reason you cant publish is because there Is nothing to publish in your paper..
 
Top