Richard Dawkins’s response to his de-platforming in Berkeley
Please discuss. Should speakers be "de-platformed" for "hurtful" speach? If so, should they be allowed to defend themselves before being de-platformed? If not, are there any grounds upon which speakers should be denied the right to speak?
Please discuss. Should speakers be "de-platformed" for "hurtful" speach? If so, should they be allowed to defend themselves before being de-platformed? If not, are there any grounds upon which speakers should be denied the right to speak?