Again. No. You are stretching a statement to fit a book. Like stretching a party balloon to fit New York. In other words, misrepresenting what I said.
However, I am not going to argue with you. I know how that goes.
You are completely missing the point.
The point is, no matter how much forensic evidence one has, the circumstantial evidence may be such, that the conclusion may be wrong.
Nope. Again, please don't misrepresent my statements.
I said... Give me one of the tons of facts supporting the theory that is not a hypothesis... just one
That is what I said, which was in response to your claim regarding evolutionary theory.
As I said, I'll repeat... Genetics is a study, just like biology, zoology, etc. It's not something you can say, is a fact supporting the theory of evolution. Biology is not a fact supporting the theory of evolution.
, and here
Perhaps you are thinking of population genetics... a subfield of genetics, I don't know.
models are used both for statistical inference from DNA sequence data and for proof/disproof of concept.
Or, perhaps you are referring to comparing the DNA genetic sequences from which they infer common descent. That is not genetics, but it is one of several method which is used to study the hypothesis of evolutionary history. It is one of a number of hypotheses. So is comparative anatomy.
I'm not telling you what to do, or not to do, like you keep telling me.
However what you are telling me is not anything in line with RF rules. So I don't understand why you are ordering me. Are you even staff? Nay.
It's sad that some atheist are so uptight
, though, and seem so angry
all the time. It's as though they can't seem to even have a light conversation.
Perhaps, it seems, they are just sore losers, and get extremely annoyed
when they have to try and defend their beloved philosophical belief. It's no one's fault that they chose to believe something so
that the only evidence it has to prop it up are a bunch of absurd ideas.
All they can do is act tough
, while inside they are crying
. As though they so badly want their belief to be true, as though that faith will somehow get rid of God.
But it's just a weak helpless, rootless, baseless, fruitless tree, imo.
Why? Your last comment seems so cold, unfriendly , and insulting,
I am prompted take up last your invitation.
Here is you, ridiculing.
...you're willing to take the Bible's word at face value no matter how ridiculous it's claims are? No matter what way you try to justify it, that is pure and simple delusion.
May I recommend, if you have a problem with persons using emojis, why not take it up with the RF staff?
I am sure you don't have the authority to tell anyone, when, how, or if to use them, and. I am sure RF didn't put those emojis there to sit as un-welcomed spectators. Nor to make someone look clever. However, I find they can add a little humor and friendliness. However, I can see how they might be annoying to someone who may think more of themselves than is necessary, and who might pride themselves in the belief that they have a "superior intelligence", and "unmatched cleverness".
Why... a simple smiley emoji
seem to cause some atheists to blow a fuse.