• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Reasons for believing in the Bible as the literal word of God.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
no, you were babbling about "proof" when @Trailblazer had already said in the very first sentence that she was not bringing "proof".
Nope, you are projecting again.

If you do not understand something, as you clearly did not, it is better to ask questions honestly then to make foolishly false claims. I quoted the line of hers that refuted your claims to you twice. Now that you finally realize that you screwed up all you can do is go back to personal attacks. You still do not understand what she said that was wrong. Amazing! She admitted to not having proof. Yes, but why did you stop there? Her error was in the next sentence where she made the mistake of saying that "Verifiable evidence is proof". Do you believe that? All of my evidence is verifiable evidence. By your constantly agreeing with her you are saying that I disproved the Ark myth.

You claimed to be "smart'". Then why can't you debate properly? Why can't you understand the simplest of posts? Perhaps your hatred is getting in the way of your reasoning.
 

exchemist

Veteran Member
The satanists like the idea that they can manipulate an atheist, specifically an ex-Christian to "lose their inhibitions" and do things which are counter to what is considered normal. One of those sorts of things is participating in orgies. Which is something that had been promoted around here by an atheist, who had partnered up with satansists, and occurs virtually in the private EROS forum. There is a satanist who posts here who did this, somewhat recently. But it will be difficult to find the post because, they, I'm guessing, hide their profile. It was a rule violation to post what they did. Maybe it was taken down. I literally don't know.

@Subduction Zone behaves as someone who is easily influenced and motivated and probably manipulated by physical gratification. Put simply, physical sexual pleasure is inspiring to him. So, it is evidence of a demon of which a person can be completely ignorant. You asked for evidence, and I am bringing you some.

The manner that these "treatment resistant demons" operate is similar. It's actually a cooperation among them, and it's the same sort of demon that you appear to be possessing.
Are you mentally ill? How the hell do you justify concluding that "physical sexual pleasure is inspiring" to someone who has not posted anything about sex?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
A "So what?" doesn't refute anything.
That is because personal opinions don't refute anything.
You are incorrect. It only refutes the weakest of evidence And that is all that you had. It is why so many atheists told you that you have no evidence.

So make up your mind. Is "So what?" evidence to be counted as evidence or not?


For example your claims about what your prophet said:

That only requires a "So what?" to refute. Almost all of the examples you chose are that weak.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
I can keep dishing out ignores. I learned it from your religion. See? I understand how your religion works, and I can employ it at will. While you seem to be a slave to it.
And another false claim about others. First off when you claim that you are ignoring a post everyone knows that is a falsehood. By responding you refute your own claim. Since an ignored post is simply not responded to then you must have meant something else. And since you are wrong well over 990% of the time recently it appears to be a shortcut for admitting that you were wrong. I would not want to make any of the less charitable explanations that could be applied to your false use of ignore. So I assumed out of politeness that you were owning up to being wrong. And since I like to respond to politeness with politeness I thanked your for admitting that you are wrong.
 
Last edited:

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
And another false claim about others. First off when you claim that you are ignoring a post everyone knows that is a falsehood. By responding you refute your own claim. An ignored post is simply not responded to then you must have meant something else. And since you are wrong well over 990% of the time recently it appears to be a shortcut for admitting that you were wrong. I would not want to make any of the less charitable explanations that could be applied to your false use of ignore. So I assumed out of politeness that you were owning up to being wrong. And since I like to respond to politeness with politeness I thanked your for admitting that you are wrong.

Ignored means, I don't care. It doesn't mean I didn't read it. Please be assured, I do read your posts. If they deserve a response I will give it. Otherwise, I will skip it. if you quote me, and I don't care because it is meaningless preaching of faux-atheism, where you are proclaiming "Hail Satan" repeatedly, bowing to a god, while the Satanists giggle in the background seeing how easily manipulated you are...

I will type "ignored".
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Ignored means, I don't care. It doesn't mean I didn't read it. Please be assured, I do read your posts. If they deserve a response I will give it. Otherwise, I will skip it. if you quote me, and I don't care because it is meaningless preaching of faux-atheism, where you are proclaiming "Hail Satan" repeatedly, bowing to a god, while the Satanists giggle in the background seeing how easily manipulated you are...

I will type "ignored".
At best you are just fooling yourself.
 

Audie

Veteran Member
I never claimed that 'what my prophet said' constitutes evidence.
His Writings are 'part' of the evidence but His claims are not evidence of any kind.
I have said that on this forum many times.
Seems like distinction sans difference
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
I am never going to read random quotes from a tare. Tares can quote scripture.
Since Jesus often prefaced his statements with the words, " It is written...." referring to Scripture then according to the ^ above ^ Jesus is a Tare.
 

URAVIP2ME

Veteran Member
Pharaoh did not change his mind. God overrode Pharaoh's free will and changed Pharaoh's mind for him.
Not overrode but more like allowed ( give a person enough rope and....... )
1st Samuel 6:6; Exodus 8:32 ( <- I know those verses will Not be read but that does Not mean they are Not there )
 

ppp

Well-Known Member
Since Jesus often prefaced his statements with the words, " It is written...." referring to Scripture then according to the ^ above ^ Jesus is a Tare.
Um, actually...that would mean that Scripture is a tare. I'm good with that.
 

dybmh

דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
Um, actually...that would mean that Scripture is a tare. I'm good with that.

nooo.... try reading that again without the know-it-all vendetta against a religion that didn't meet your desire.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top