All I’m saying is that your source is wrong.
On what grounds? And how do you know your c=source is accurate?
My sources are varied and partly corroborative. And the historical facts cannot be denied.
You are simply assuming that whatever some bloke said must be true - even though some of it is demonstrably untrue.
As you were not there you are relying on on sources that weren’t there either so you cannot present any argument as evidence.
The history of the expansion of the Muslim empire was recorded by various sources, some eye-witnesses. There is also archaeological evidence. You don't seem to uxnderdstrand how the study of history works.
Also, Bahaullah was not there so you can't use what he said as an argument, especially as he doesn't cite any supporting evidence.
The only true evidence is the Quran itself.
What are you taking about? There is plenty of evidence to show the Islamic empire expanding massively over the years during and after Muhammad's reign.
IF Baha’u’llah IS a Prophet sent by God then His Words are pure truth.
Unfortunately for your argument, you cannot even show that a god exists, so you can't claim that Bahaullah was anything to do with that god. The usual circular logic claims made by Bahais are obvious nonsense.
That’s the real issue here because all my arguments are based on God revealing the truth to His Manifestations.
Which is why your position is untenable.
So if you wish to prove my arguments wrong you must first prove Baha’u’llah is not true as I am claiming that His knowledge trumps everyone elses.
"Burden of proof" dear thing. You are claiming that a god exists, and that Bahaullah was his messenger. Therefore it is
your responsibility to show said god exists before you can make any further claims involving it. And you can't do that. You simply resort to circular logic.
Unless as a human being you’re claiming you are infallible and can’t be wrong then you could be very wrong.
lol. Don't need to. I just need to show that my explanation is more likely, or my argument better supported than your god claim. And it clearly is.
But I’m claiming my source of information is not human but Divine and as such is infallible true knowledge based on the belief Baha’u’llah is a Manifestation of God.
But as you cannot provide anything to support your claim, it can be dismissed.
If you don’t want to consider Baha’u’llah could be a Manifestation then there’s no point in continuing this debate because I’ve found it to be true beyond doubt so all we can do is each go our own way.
You believe it to be true, but you are unable to show that your belief is true.
1. How Bahá'ís View Islam....
I could post a number of passages on how other groups or individuals have a very different view of Islam. Not sure what your point is?
