firedragon
Veteran Member
Sure, it is a natural behavior to seek the meaning of words from their authors
1. So are you saying Muhammed presented the Qur'an as "His authorship"? Is there any evidence to this?
2. Also, do you believe that Muhammed authored the Quran or was it like a latter project?
The explanations given in the hadith that were orally transmitted.
Err. Which explanations, what is the transmission? What in the world are you speaking about? When you say "They" what is it? why is this relevant?
A)A phone call can't wait for the insignificant amount of time for a mother to finish nursing and put the baby down and call back?
B)You've never seen a nursing woman with a baby in one arm and a phone in the other calling her family and friends?
Lol. You are wrong. I think since you dont intend to, you dont understand what someone says.
See, without inconveniencing this nursing mom, one could send the "Other witness". DO YOU UNDERSTAND THIS SIMPLE SENTENCE my friend?
It doesn't explicitly say anything about nursing either in my opinion. Also I said "suitable" not "inferior"
Sure it does not. But like you rendered this verse with the baggage you have, I rendered it with the baggage I have. You have a male superiority rendering, while I have given you the explanation of the Quran bi Quran methodology and understood it with my "Male and Female are equal in salvation and intellect" understanding.
You are asking me concerning things I have no knowledge of, but I'm sure an omniscient omnipotent God could have either selected or invented and explained a non-dual word to avoid the centuries of inconvenience to women caused by the ambiguity of a dual word which it should have been able to foresee.
I am showing your double standards. It is your problem. Also, you just created a strawman.
This is just about a word. Let me ask you again since you have not understood this though said two times over.
1. Earlier, you refused to acknowledge a simple arabic word which is dual plural as dual but you insisted it was "singular".
2. Why do you accept this Dual noun as a dual instead of similarly insisting that it is also "singular"?
Lol. Do you understand mate? Just say you made a mistake the previous time. Its perfectly fine.