RedDragon94
Love everyone, meditate often
Which came first, the Bible or Norse Mythology?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
if your using a bible somewhat as we know it now......(stretch and reach for this)Which came first, the Bible or Norse Mythology?
There is a common thread running through all ancient religions..... ... belief that an immoral part of man departs from the body at death
Exactly. I was going to say, "It depends how you mean this question. Are you talking about the oral tradition that predated the books or the codification into books?" Even then Christianity goes back a few hundred years before the Bible was written. So, Meh!Which, in short, means it's really hard to say.
That's funny, because not even your religion started off with one god. YHVH (Jehovah--however you transliterate the Tetragrammaton) was but one god in the Canaanite pantheon, until his cult grew in power, merged him with El (the chief deity), and took over from there.It is interesting to investigate where all the various religions that worshipped multiple "gods" came from, if we all started off with one God and one truth in the garden of Eden.
Do you know what "licentious" means? I think you need something to back that up, because even Freyja had her scruples.Belief in giants and powerful but licentious gods goes back to the earliest religions.
I second Jainarayan; this is not a universal at all. Norse beliefs don’t have a “place of eternal torture”, and for the Greeks Tartarus wasn’t for the wicked, but those who had personally angered the gods. “Unquenchable flames” was also not a motif, and pulls from the Jewish metaphors of burning pits for garbage. Few – if any – European beliefs had a notion of “immoral parts of humanity” in the sense of a sinful soul. I don’t know where you’re getting that from, but it’s largely inaccurate.There is a common thread running through all ancient religions.....Belief in more than one god; belief that an immoral part of man departs from the body at death; and a place of eternal torture for the wicked….usually in flames that cannot be extinguished.
That’s not quite how it happened. Rome was always very accommodating to other beliefs for that time (except during Nero’s reign), and often held places of worship for many religions in the same spaces. When Christianity became the state religion, they took on the habit of merging everything completely; taking applicable practices (e.g. Saturnalia’s relation to Christmas) and changing them to apply to Christian beliefs. Enough was kept so that it would remain familiar to the non-Christians, and make for conversion all the more easier.When Constantine wanted Roman Catholicism to become the state religion in Rome, he saw to it that the pagan Romans still had their favorite beliefs and celebrations by changing their names to something the Christians did not object to....so all religions end up being related in some way.
We’re not comparing history with what the Bible says, as the two paint very different pictures. If anything, here the topic is the history of various religions – namely the Norse. Those beliefs did not come from anything biblical, nor are the Norse gods the Nephilim.If you line up this history with what the Bible says, it all becomes very clear.
When did the oral traditions begin for both?Exactly. I was going to say, "It depends how you mean this question. Are you talking about the oral tradition that predated the books or the codification into books?" Even then Christianity goes back a few hundred years before the Bible was written. So, Meh!
We don't know a lot about the lore from the prehistoric record. @gnostic any ideas on how far back the tales go in Nordic mythology? I've asked Gnostic because he has researched this sort of stuff well before I first met him over a dozen years ago. (He'd probably have a kitten if I let him have a look at my ancient copy of the Nibelungenlied.)When did the oral traditions begin for both?
Not true.
No, it's not true. Heathenry teaches that we have both soul and spirit, yet is lacking of any realm of eternal punishment. You're speaking about things you know little to nothing about, it seems.It is true of any religion that teaches that man "has" a soul rather than him "being" a soul.
It'd be near impossible to tell this, given the nature of oral traditions. But if we're going by known archeological records then we have the following:When did the oral traditions begin for both?
Hinduism is in opposition to biblical Christianity on almost every count of its belief system yet it has the same thread running through it as all the rest....belief in a multiplicity of gods, an immortal soul passing through rebirth from one body to another, and a place where the wicked are punished. So, it is true.
It is opposed to Christianity in that Christians believe in just one God who is both personal and knowable.
Ooo nice link.We don't know a lot about the lore from the prehistoric record. @gnostic any ideas on how far back the tales go in Nordic mythology? I've asked Gnostic because he has researched this sort of stuff well before I first met him over a dozen years ago. (He'd probably have a kitten if I let him have a look at my ancient copy of the Nibelungenlied.)
A no frills website, but some good info there. Timeless Myths
Although the section on Ymir should be greatly expanded.
That's funny, because not even your religion started off with one god. YHVH (Jehovah--however you transliterate the Tetragrammaton) was but one god in the Canaanite pantheon, until his cult grew in power, merged him with El (the chief deity), and took over from there.
Do you know what "licentious" means? I think you need something to back that up, because even Freyja had her scruples.
I second Jainarayan; this is not a universal at all. Norse beliefs don’t have a “place of eternal torture”, and for the Greeks Tartarus wasn’t for the wicked, but those who had personally angered the gods. “Unquenchable flames” was also not a motif, and pulls from the Jewish metaphors of burning pits for garbage. Few – if any – European beliefs had a notion of “immoral parts of humanity” in the sense of a sinful soul. I don’t know where you’re getting that from, but it’s largely inaccurate.
When Christianity became the state religion, they took on the habit of merging everything completely; taking applicable practices (e.g. Saturnalia’s relation to Christmas) and changing them to apply to Christian beliefs. Enough was kept so that it would remain familiar to the non-Christians, and make for conversion all the more easier.
We’re not comparing history with what the Bible says, as the two paint very different pictures. If anything, here the topic is the history of various religions – namely the Norse. Those beliefs did not come from anything biblical, nor are the Norse gods the Nephilim.
So to answer the threads question, I would say that it's very safe to bet that Norse mythology came about well before the Bible, or even Hebrew mythology.
Heathenry teaches that we have both soul and spirit, yet is lacking of any realm of eternal punishment. You're speaking about things you know little to nothing about, it seems.
Archaeology and human history says so. This is something that you can quite easily search for on your own, is very common knowledge, and is not lacking in sources for you to cut your teeth on. I am not going to provide links for something so prevalent.Can we have links for YHWH being only one god of the Canaanite pantheon. Who says so?
Oh, I'm sorry. I'm basing my statements on cultural fact, not a mythological story shared by several cultures of the Fertile Crescent.Since YHWH goes back to the garden of Eden
That's just more slander, not anything to back up your claims. You're specifically mentioning "licentious gods", not demons or nephilim. Do you have any clue what you're talking about, or are you just regurgitating rubbish spoon-fed to you with the Jehovah's Witness seal of approval?The demon fathers and their disgusting offspring were very licentious.
By stating that any religion that teaches of a human spirit also has a place of eternal punishment, you included Norse beliefs by proxy. And you are wrong; there is no realm of eternal suffering and punishment where the wicked and undesirable are sent.I don't think I mentioned Norse beliefs in that context
Helheimr is the Hall of the Dead, yes. It is not a place of suffering, but of final rest.The name of the place where they went as well of the goddess who welcomed them was Hel, wasn't it?
Then you don't see very well. Those who die honorably - either in battle or with great renown and glory - are chosen to live among the Einherjar in the Halls of Valhalla and Sessrúmnir. Those who die accursed - murderers, rapists and oathbreakers - are devoured by Níðhöggr at the shores of Náströnd, and are no more.I see that Norse beliefs involve no notion of reward or punishment...
Yes, there was, and that's where what I said is not what you said. Entire myths of various gods in the Roman pantheon were merged into the figure of your Christ, and several mythical locations conglomerated to form your perdition. You may see this as a "paganization" of Christianity, but it's the exact opposite; these images and stories were given a Christian veneer, and took on Christian meanings not native to what they were before.Which is basically what I said. There was no "Christianizing" of paganism in Roman Catholicism
No, it's not.All mythology is based on the Bible's account of the flood,
No, it's not, as I've demonstrated in Post #14. Norse artifacts outdate even pre-Abrahamic notions by at least two centuries, and that's being generous. Disagree if you will, but the best thing that you've got riding against archeological fact is myth. Which does not stand up to it at all.The Norse religion is young compared to Abrahamic beliefs.
Cool. So the Dagenham idol of Odin, Chieftain of the Æsir gods in Norse beliefs, is still 232 years older than Abraham. You do know how dates work Before Common Era, right?Abraham was born around 2018 BCE.
According to myth, this cannot be said enough. The Völuspá takes us back to the forming of the cosmos, so I'm hoping you can see how futile discussion is when relying on mythology to prove our points.The Bible takes us back over 1600 years before Abraham.
Research more, and actually listen to people who try to explain things to you - even things you disagree with. Elsewise you remain in an ignorant state.I speak about what I have researched.
The notion of humans having multiple souls/spirits has root in Animism, which was the faith system before civilization. Meaning that it far outdates Judaism and Early Christianity by a significant span of time. So your claim here of "pagan infiltration" is just baseless nonsense.Having a soul and a spirit is taught in Judaism and original Christianity, but when pagan ideas began to infiltrate the "church" it followed the path of the pagans...
I know what Christians believe... I was Christian for half of my 60 years.