That isn’t more complicated at all, it’s just proponents of magical explanations try to make it appear more complicated because they have no concrete explanations for their beliefs. “Can’t explain” means “can’t explain” so defining experiences with an explanation (“telepathic”, “out of body experience”) is flawed at best, dishonest at worst. The fact remains that there are known and demonstrated mundane brain functions that could account for all of these experiences. They’re not definitive but they offer realistic possibilities. There is currently absolutely no viable hypothesis and certainly no definitive evidence for any kind of paranormal or supernatural explanations and until any such hypothesis has been presented, I don’t see it as a legitimate consideration at all.
Not sure if you are agreeing with me or not.
I cite the twins as examples of things we simply don't know about.
I am 100% sure that when one twin knows something about the
state of the other, regardless of the distance between them (as
has been documented) that some phenomena is at work - perhaps
quantum entanglement or some such thing. But it's irritating when
people will say "There's no explanation how twins can telepathically
communicate, therefor it doesn't happen."
As a rule. If people keep reporting strange things over long periods
of time then you can sure there's some real going on.
The Loch Ness monster phenomena led to an understanding of
deep and narrow lochs where warm water overlays cold water,
and you can have cold underwater "waves."
And in Australia the aboriginal "min-min light" which "follows you
at night was shown to be light being channeled between layers
of cold and warm air over vast distances.
So there WAS something in the loch, and lights which "follow"
you at night.
Now think ghosts and aliens.