I see many folks say that they need guns for self defense, but I'm not sure if they had the choice if being in a confrontation with a criminal if they would prefer it being with guns or without guns that they would feel safer shooting it out.
The safest way to live is to work to avoid being a victim of a criminal interaction. Obviously many situations are random and just bad luck. The children in rooms 111 and 112 of Robb elementary just had worse luck than those in rooms 106 and 107 across the hall. You might be at your bank at the wrong time of the wrong day. Just bad luck. Are you going to prefer to shoot it out with robbers in the bank, outnumbered and they already have a gun on you? Do you want to risk your life for the bank's money, that's insured anyway?
If you are walking down the street with your wife and kids after having dinner and some guy pulls a knife and wants your wallet, are you going to try to get some distance and pull your gun before the guy takes a kid hostage for a shield? Maybe have a fake wallet to give the guy so no one's life is in danger.
There are so many scenarios where a gun is not going to be an effective solution. In some places self defense is limited to equal force, so shooting a guy with a knife might get you indicted. You have a case to make, but are you ready to spend thousands for lawyers? I don't see pro-gun people thinking through as they portray.