QUANTUM mechanics made simple !

[james blunt]

ecco said: ↑
It's not 0. It's not 10. You haven't just failed basic algebra, you've also failed basic arithmetic.

It's no wonder that you believe you can make quantum-mechanics-simple.​

I do not know why the answer is 0 any more than I know why the earth is flat. That's because the answer is not 0 and the earth is not flat.

I do know why you believe the answer is 0. However, forum etiquette prevents me from actually stating it.

ecco said: ↑
It's not 0. It's not 10. You haven't just failed basic algebra, you've also failed basic arithmetic.

It's no wonder that you believe you can make quantum-mechanics-simple.​

I do not know why the answer is 0 any more than I know why the earth is flat. That's because the answer is not 0 and the earth is not flat.

I do know why you believe the answer is 0. However, forum etiquette prevents me from actually stating it.

In my theory if you take away a or b from a or b , a and B cannot exist anymore .

 

[ecco]

In my theory if you take away a or b from a or b , a and B cannot exist anymore .

You have a baseball (1b).
I do not have a baseball (0b).
I take your baseball away. (1b -> 1b).
You do not have a baseball (0b).
I have a baseball (1b).

The baseball (1b) still exists.


The above is proof that your theory is wrong.

 

[ChristineM]

Right, but in practice it is used to describe, for example, bonding in molecules and the macroscopic properties of solids. It is impossible to do modern solid state physics without quantum mechanics. For that matter, much of statistical mechanics is also impossible without QM.

To say it *only* deals with the subatomic realm is simply false. Now, it explains that larger scale phenomena in terms of the interactions of the subatomic particles (primarily nuclei and electrons for both solid state and stat. mech.), but it most certainly goes well beyond the subatomic level.

You have done it again you naughty boy, you have widened my education. Cheers

 

[james blunt]

You have a baseball (1b).
I do not have a baseball (0b).
I take your baseball away. (1b -> 1b).
You do not have a baseball (0b).
I have a baseball (1b).

The baseball (1b) still exists.


The above is proof that your theory is wrong.

Dude , I just went to reply to you , writing an explanation. I then deleted it and wrote this because I can't tell you stuff about this on here . Ok , understand .

 

[Milton Platt]

Atomic matter

Field matter


Occupies space !

Thank goodness some body laid it all,out in plain language.

 

[james blunt]

Thank goodness some body laid it all,out in plain language.

Well! Physics is hardly biology.

 

[Milton Platt]

Well! Physics is hardly biology.

on the other hand, it has evolved over time.......

 

[ecco]

ecco said: ↑​

You have a baseball (1b).
I do not have a baseball (0b).
I take your baseball away. (1b -> 1b).
You do not have a baseball (0b).
I have a baseball (1b).

The baseball (1b) still exists.


The above is proof that your theory is wrong.

Dude , I just went to reply to you , writing an explanation. I then deleted it and wrote this because I can't tell you stuff about this on here . Ok , understand .

So, I just proved your theory is wrong, but you don't want to admit it, so you pretend it's too "classified" to rebut it publicly. I do understand.

 

[Revoltingest]

I recognize some of the math used here.

You have done it again you naughty boy, you have widened my education. Cheers

What say we get him behind the bleachers,
& give'm a wedgie, eh?

 

[ChristineM]

I recognize some of the math used here.
;
What say we get him behind the bleachers,
& give'm a wedgie, eh?

So do i, the + and - are my level.

Whatever turns you on but count me out of schoolyard japes

 

[james blunt]

on the other hand, it has evolved over time.......

I suppose it has !

Still kinda stuck on using fuels though , rather than being fueld by the natural. Do you like natural ?

I

 

[Polymath257]

I recognize some of the math used here.

What say we get him behind the bleachers,
& give'm a wedgie, eh?

Damn, I was hoping for a kiss (from @ChristineM , not you).

 

[Revoltingest]

Damn, I was hoping for a kiss (from @ChristineM , not you).

See where it leads.

 

[ChristineM]

Damn, I was hoping for a kiss (from @ChristineM , not you).

 

[james blunt]

Well I suppose it's time I give up .

Pointless talking to walls , I will await the end .

 

[james blunt]