james blunt
Well-Known Member
PS I'm on a tablet it is hard work. Yessubato.icfileds
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It s far from rambling !
Ummmm , it's going to be difficult to explain without giving the students tools . You know there is a sense of need sometimes to eat meat and not share it if you are hungry . You know like theres always holes in everything to consider it s not like a microwave dinner .
Do you assume I don't know the standard models and thoughts?
My theory understands the strong nuclear force , its quite pretty .
You have such a poor mind if you think that . I don't need numbers to start a fire , ask the cave man about physics .Yes.
You can't even do sums with negative numbers. Quantum mechanics requires you to understand complex numbers (involving the square root of -1). That's just standard quantum mechanics, before we get to quantum field theory and the standard model...
I can envision it quite well actually .I doubt the theory understands
I can envision it quite well actually .
Yes of course ,I am sure you can, but could you justify it to particle physicist?
I don't need numbers to start a fire , ask the cave man about physics .
Woodshavings and electrolytesYou were talking about quantum mechanics. Ask a cave man (or yourself, for that matter) how to design a semiconductor device.
Yes of course ,
A chalk board and explanation goes a long wayLaughing.
Are you sure?QM is the study of the sub atomic, not the atomic.
A chalk board and explanation goes a long way
Are you sure?
Who's Jim RyanKnowing what you are talking about goes further
Are you sure you are not related to Jim Ryan?
Who's Jim Ryan
I know very well what I am talking about because my theory is my theory after all . When you eventually see my theory which involves scientists of our past you will understand it then . It is not malarkey when I use some very basic facts .
It starts like this :
1. Newton
I did some research on Newton work to pick out bits.
I.e absolute space
Individual from atomic matter and field matter
See I don't make things up , Newton was correct on absolute space
Delta k = 0
I also have backing facts about space , hence I conclude an infinite void to begin with .
Facts , space cannot be created or destroyed or displaced ,
You seem to have managed to join the worst of religion with the worst of scientism.Physics is the reality of observation and what happens etc, maths is invented and made to fit the process . Maths is relative and means very little , what you call a big is small to something bigger . You have no idea about physics . And reality .
Delta k = w
It only = 0 in a static environment, space is not static
Describe an infinite void in scientific terms without using philosophy or the french rock group
Where did displaced come from. Winds blow