How would you decide the amount of the fine if one cheater is a minimum wage McDonald's employee and the other a Trumpish billionaire married to an aging supermodel who knew him very well when she landed him?I voted paying a fine.
Tom
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
How would you decide the amount of the fine if one cheater is a minimum wage McDonald's employee and the other a Trumpish billionaire married to an aging supermodel who knew him very well when she landed him?I voted paying a fine.
I voted paying a fine. The person should be charged for it, so, it is recorded. If the person did it again second time, a higher fine he must pay every time. It can be very devastating for a partner, whose partner cheats and comitts adultery.
So you want the secular state to make money off cheating spouses?
Who gets the fine money? And if it goes to the state, won't that hurt the person who got cheated on? That seems doubly-cruel.
No, would it not be best if people did not cheat.
Regards Tony
Maybe. But it's none of my business... I believe in freedom.
We have to be careful as to not adopt the zealotry of the primitives in the third world.
Essentially lording-over others is more for those with a lust for power than it is a tool for actual good.
No, would it not be best if people did not cheat.
The fine would make a lot of sense, and a lot of money. Society wins out because minimum wage people would not be able to afford to have affairs. And, to make more money for border walls or the military, rich people could be encouraged to have affairs. And more middle-class people would be encouraged to make more money so that they can someday afford to fool around.How would you decide the amount of the fine if one cheater is a minimum wage McDonald's employee and the other a Trumpish billionaire married to an aging supermodel who knew him very well when she landed him?
Tom
Well, marriage is a contract and promise between two parties. Shouldn't breaking a contract be punishable?
No, would it not be best if people did not cheat.
Regards Tony
So it would be best if people did cheat?
YESNo, would it not be best if people did not cheat.
NOSo it would be best if people did cheat?
So not doublespeak, but triplespeak? Gotchagotchagotcha.It looked like a triple negative to me
Cheating is a violation of trust
An open relationship is an exploration of trust
So you want the secular state to make money off cheating spouses?
No, would it not be best if people did not cheat.
Regards Tony
So it would be best if people did cheat?
It looked like a triple negative to me
So not doublespeak, but triplespeak? Gotchagotchagotcha.