• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Punishment for adultery

What should be punishment for adultery?


  • Total voters
    42

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
Yes, but what is the Greek word translated "homosexual" by the NASB translators?

Are you able to read
The Strong's concordance of the Greek Language has ( Adulterers) meaning
homosexual

Where as you will find in
1 Corinthians 6:9--Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind"

Now take ( Adulterers) in the Strong's concordance of the Greek Language translation,
Meaning ( homosexual)
 

CG Didymus

Veteran Member
Seeing you have no understanding about...
Sure, then clear things up. Teach me what it means.
In other words a homosexual,
man with man. Will not enter the kingdom of God.
Sounds like you agree with that interpretation.
Seeing how I don't go by the NASB all because man's teachings have corrupted the teachings of Christ Jesus.
So those translators are part of a conspiracy to corrupt the teachings of Jesus?

Maybe had those translators had any knowledge about the Greek and Hebrew languages, they would haved done alot better job in their translation of the Greek and Hebrew languages.
So they don't have any knowledge about the languages they are translating?

Had you read what I said you would have found it was not me saying Adulterers means homosexual,
But you quoted it and seem to agree with it. Since I obviously read what you said but didn't understand it the way you wanted me to understand it. Do you get misunderstood a lot?
Are you able to read
Sure, but I can't read into what goes on in your head. But I learned all I need to about what you believe. Thanks.
 

Shaul

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Yeah sure it will, maybe you should let Christ Jesus know that, seeing Christ Jesus has put in his book of Revelation.
The muslims will have ownner ship over the temple mount
I guess you didn’t hear. The Israelis took control of the Temple Mount back in 1967. Honest, it was in the newspapers and everything.
 

Faithofchristian

Well-Known Member
I guess you didn’t hear. The Israelis took control of the Temple Mount back in 1967. Honest, it was in the newspapers and everything.

I guess you didn't hear, Israel returned the temple mount back to the Muslims.

The Astonishing Israeli Concession of 1967
In a triumphant moment, Israel’s flag was hoisted over the newly conquered Temple Mount—then quickly taken down.

Even at this late stage, the paratroopers had little idea of what awaited them in the narrow alleys within the walled Old City. In fact, most of the Jordanian troops stationed inside the walls had slipped out the night before; the Old City lay open.

Gur’s half-track led the attack, crashing through the massive bronze doors onto the Via Delarosa, then turning left and onto the Temple Mount. Gur and Achmon rushed up a flight of stairs leading to a large plaza—the golden Dome of the Rock and the silver-domed al-Aqsa. Gur radioed headquarters: “The Temple Mount is in our hands.” He wasn’t just making a military report, but staking a historic claim. The focus of centuries of Jewish longing, the place toward which Jews prayed no matter where they lived, was now in Israeli hands.

The brigade’s chief communications officer, Ezra Orni, retrieved an Israeli flag from his pouch and asked Gur whether he should hang it over the Dome of the Rock. “Yalla,” said Gur, go up. Achmon accompanied him into the Dome of the Rock. They climbed to the top of the building and victoriously fastened the Israeli flag onto a pole topped with an Islamic crescent.


Except then the flag was quickly and unceremoniously lowered. Defense Minister Moshe Dayan, watching the scene through binoculars from Mount Scopus, urgently radioed Gur and demanded: Do you want to set the Middle East on fire? Gur told Achmon to remove the flag. But Achmon couldn’t bear the notion of lowering the Israeli flag, and so he instructed one of his men to do it instead.

It is, in retrospect, an astonishing moment of religious restraint. The Jewish people had just returned to its holiest site, from which it had been denied access for centuries, only to effectively yield sovereignty at its moment of triumph. Shortly after the war, Dayan met with officials of the Muslim Wakf, who governed the holy site, and formally returned the Mount to their control. While Israeli soldiers would determine security and stand at the gates, the Wakf would determine who prayed at the site, an arrangement that would effectively bar non-Muslim prayer. The Temple Mount was no longer in Gur’s hands.

An unplanned victory ended in a spontaneous concession. No cabinet meeting authorized Dayan’s move. The defense minister simply took advantage of his popularity within the Israeli public to manage Israel’s most sensitive religious problem—an arrangement that has persisted ever since.


In ceding the right of Jews to pray on the Mount, Dayan’s intention was to minimize bloodshed and prevent the Palestinian-Israeli conflict from becoming a holy war. He was supported by most of Israel’s religious establishment, which was keen on preventing Jews from trespassing on the Holy of Holies—the area of the ancient Temple which only the high priest was permitted to enter, and then only on Yom Kippur, and whose precise location was no longer known.

Israelis still vehemently argue over whether Dayan acted with wisdom or weakness. A Knesset lobby has tried, without success, to pressure the government into allowing some form of Jewish prayer on the Mount. Meanwhile, small groups of religious Jews ascend the Mount, seeking to maintain a Jewish presence. As they walk about the stone plaza, they are accompanied by Wakf guards who watch their lips to ensure that no prayers are being recited. Jews attempting to pray on the Mount are escorted away.

For all the pain many Israelis feel in being denied the right to pray at what is, after all, Judaism’s holiest site, every Israeli government, including on the political right, has upheld the status quo.

Now, looking back, Achmon upholds Dayan’s decision to lower the flag over the Dome of the Rock. “We were all in euphoria and only Dayan was thinking with a clear head and understood the wider consequences,” Achmon, who just celebrated his 84th birthday, told me. “Can you imagine what the reaction would have been in the Muslim world if a photograph of that had been published? I’m proud that we raised the flag, and I’m relieved that we took it down.”
 
Last edited:

wandering peacefully

Which way to the woods?
Premium Member
And, again, divorce doesn’t “undo” adultery or make the victims whole. Indeed divorce can compound the injury of adultery, not cure it! And, again, the unwitting spouse isn’t the only victim of adultery. What about the children? Do you think a child that suffers because a parent commits adultery is helped when the parents divorce? That adds insult to injury.


Not always , but most of the time, there is a good reason for looking outside the marriage for a better relationship. Usually because the spouse is a total hole to the person they are married too. Instead of going off the deep-end for having your spouse look elsewhere for blame, people should always turn inside to see what they are doing wrong if they are really interested in keeping the marriage together.

If not, it was still only sex. It's not the end of the world. Parents shouldn't be mature and thoughtful and not bring their children into their marriage problems. If there is a divorce because some party can't mend their ego, they should remain friends for the children's sakes.

If it was or is more than sex then the marriage is over anyway. I'm in no way condoning adultery but it isn't the end of the world either unless you decide make it that way.
 
Top