• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Proof of Creationism made by NASA

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
James Webb powerful telescope have disproven 13.7-billion-year history after Big Bang. The only alternative to billion years is 6000 years of Universe history, which Dr. Kent Hovind has talked about.
The Kent's idea is what Universe is 6000 years old. More in:
Omphalos hypothesis - Wikipedia

Look the party at Kent's friends:


It was Physics' Community who has introduced Big Bang and Darwinism. Now we found that it was a lie. Not Creationism is lie, but Scientific Community has lied. Because it has ignored Genesis of the Bible.
 
Last edited:

muhammad_isa

Well-Known Member
James Webb powerful telescope have disproven 13.7-billion-year history after Big Bang. The only alternative to billion years is 6000 years of Universe history, which Dr. Kent Hovind has talked about.

"Hovind has promoted several conspiracy theories about the U.S. government. He has claimed that the U.S. government was behind the 9/11 attacks and the Oklahoma City bombing."
- wiki -

You don't really believe that, do you? o_O
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
James Webb powerful telescope have disproven 13.7-billion-year history after Big Bang. The only alternative to billion years is 6000 years of Universe history, which Dr. Kent Hovind has talked about.

Look the party at Kent's friends:

Third time I have to post this. When are people gonna learn?

 

John53

I go leaps and bounds
Premium Member
No. God is not a sinner. God is Holy+Holy+Holy.

Did you bother to read your own link? Here's a couple of quotes from it that say the creator is a liar.

"verifiable evidence that the universe is older than approximately ten millennia is due to the creator introducing false evidence that makes the universe appear significantly older."

"Various supporters of Young Earth creationism have given different explanations for their belief that the universe is filled with false evidence of the universe's age,[4] including a belief that some things needed to be created at a certain age for the ecosystems to function, or their belief that the creator was deliberately planting deceptive evidence"
 

questfortruth

Well-Known Member
the creator was deliberately planting deceptive evidence"
It was Physics' Community who has introduced Big Bang and Darwinism. Now we found that it was a lie. Not Creationism is lie, but Scientific Community has lied. Because it has ignored Genesis of the Bible.
 

Jose Fly

Fisker of men
When are people gonna learn?
With creationists....never. I mean, how many times have people lined up to try and explain to a creationist what "theory" means in science or that science doesn't deal in "proof", only to see that creationist never grasp either?

It's a variation of the Upton Sinclair quote....It's difficult to get someone to understand something when their religion depends on them not understanding it.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
It was Physics' Community who has introduced Big Bang and Darwinism. Now we found that it was a lie. Not Creationism is lie, but Scientific Community has lied. Because it has ignored Genesis of the Bible.
No, neither was either a "lie", nor does the scientific community use Genesis as a scientific source. "When in Rome, do as the Romans", and when in science, do as scientists do, namely research.
 

John53

I go leaps and bounds
Premium Member
It was Physics' Community who has introduced Big Bang and Darwinism. Now we found that it was a lie. Not Creationism is lie, but Scientific Community has lied. Because it has ignored Genesis of the Bible.

I'm talking about what your link says. Why are you deflecting? The link you posted clearly claims the creator in that hypothesis is a liar.
 
Top