Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And how proud of yourself are you for filling the stereotyped role an atheist who is obsessed with religion and bashing it?
* Reverse education: Education comes from Latin 'e duco' meaning "I lead out," where in this case, the Ken Ham travesty is attempting a very great deal of "putting in" stuff that just isn't real. And to be clear, I think that is to the detriment of the nation as whole. The world is changing, and willful stupidity is very, very likely to be weeded out by the usual evolutionary forces. MAGA, in that reality, will last for a very, very short time.
Because I'd rather see AiG and everything about forgotten and left to obscurity. There are also two issues with attacking. One is it takes away from resources and time from defending public policy, and such attacks provoke Evangelicals to more than double down on their beliefs. These attacks also give them free publicity and make them money. That's why Bill Nye is a moron for debating Ken Ham, because he changes no ones mind but it gives attention and money to AiG.Not sure why @Shadow Wolf is so fiercely critical.
Controversy sells. Bill Nye is a doofus because he basically funnels money into the coffers of AiG.
And how proud of yourself are you for filling the stereotyped role an atheist who is obsessed with religion and bashing it? And given the current climate where Conservatives are loosing social power and control the best thing to do is just ignore things that are of their own private use that really isn't going to serve or cater to anyone who isn't already interested. There is school curriculum and public policy to protect from them, but areas where it's "whatever" just leave them be.
No, I did not mean it as a joke. You see, I happen to believe that those who don't delude themselves with ancient mythology and superstition, and instead pay attention to and learn from what science can teach them, will have a very real, and quite possibly very terrible, advantage over those who wallow in self-imposed ignorance. And as a result, they will have better luck procreating, and that, I'm afraid, is all that evolution needs.Hmm...I disagree with your idea that willful ignorance of evolution will be "weeded out" by natural selection. How does belief in a creation myth lead to decreased survival and/or reproduction? It doesn't. In fact, the hard-core evangelicals tend to breed the most, so, if anything, natural selection would probably favor their willful ignorance. This, of course most importantly, assumes that willful ignorance is a heritable, and not acquired, trait. I'm not so convinced it's actually heritable, so I don't know that it makes a difference either way. In any case, I don't think your argument is correct. But maybe it was intended to be a joke.
Interesting, and in a lot of ways I think I agree. I have learned, after all, that using reason to debate religious belief of any kind is 100% ineffective for the simple reason that you cannot reason someone out of something that they were never reasoned into.Because I'd rather see AiG and everything about forgotten and left to obscurity. There are also two issues with attacking. One is it takes away from resources and time from defending public policy, and such attacks provoke Evangelicals to more than double down on their beliefs. These attacks also give them free publicity and make them money. That's why Bill Nye is a moron for debating Ken Ham, because he changes no ones mind but it gives attention and money to AiG.
Those bomb vests are when they try to get it taught as school curriculum. That is where the battles must be fought. That Ark Park is silly, but it can only die in obscurity if it's left alone, instead of poked at, which will only entrench conservatives to keep fighting. It's what they want to believe, and they aren't trying to force it on anyone with that Park. Let them be the ones to waste resources on it. We have much more important battles to fight than wasting resources over such a silly thing and going with intentions that will very likely backfire. It's not easy leaving those beliefs behind, and it isn't any easier when there are fingers that mock and point instead of hands to guide.You cannot simply ignore it, when someone straps on a bomb-vest and runs into a crowded market place.
Creationism is the educational equivalent of a bomb vest-- only the "explosion" damages thinking and education.
Don't get me wrong; they most certainly need to be dealt with if/when they attempt to meddle in government and public education.Whereas I understand the sentiment as expressed by @Shadow Wolf and @Father Heathen?
And to a certain degree, they do have a point?
You cannot simply ignore it, when someone straps on a bomb-vest and runs into a crowded market place.
Creationism is the educational equivalent of a bomb vest-- only the "explosion" damages thinking and education.
Creationists dilute education with nonsense, and if you just ignore them? They not only won't go away?
They will get the even more ridiculous "intelligent design" into public schools.
Sometimes, you have to confront lunacy head-on.
I wouldn't say they weren't "never reasoned into it." They do present their reasoning, their logic, their evidence. Whether you agree with it or not, this cannot be ignored or forgotten.Interesting, and in a lot of ways I think I agree. I have learned, after all, that using reason to debate religious belief of any kind is 100% ineffective for the simple reason that you cannot reason someone out of something that they were never reasoned into.
A vastly overstated misrepresentation of the situation. The few who bother to read internet discussions/debates such as this or see YouTube videos about the Ark are nothing compared to the thousands upon thousands curious enough to walk through it. Nope, the Ark park isn't going to die because a few people don't "poke" at it. It will eventually die because of the dwindling interest---Been there. Done that.---and indebtedness. I can almost seeThat Ark Park is silly, but it can only die in obscurity if it's left alone, instead of poked at, which will only entrench conservatives to keep fighting.
That at some wierd level says that crew is more aligned with nature than atheism and atheism will go extinct!!! That's interesting interpretaion.Hmm...I disagree with your idea that willful ignorance of evolution will be "weeded out" by natural selection. How does belief in a creation myth lead to decreased survival and/or reproduction? It doesn't. In fact, the hard-core evangelicals tend to breed the most, so, if anything, natural selection would probably favor their willful ignorance. This, of course most importantly, assumes that willful ignorance is a heritable, and not acquired, trait. I'm not so convinced it's actually heritable, so I don't know that it makes a difference either way. In any case, I don't think your argument is correct. But maybe it was intended to be a joke.
"And how proud of yourself are you for filling the stereotyped role an atheist who is obsessed with religion and bashing it"Controversy sells. Bill Nye is a doofus because he basically funnels money into the coffers of AiG.
And how proud of yourself are you for filling the stereotyped role an atheist who is obsessed with religion and bashing it? And given the current climate where Conservatives are loosing social power and control the best thing to do is just ignore things that are of their own private use that really isn't going to serve or cater to anyone who isn't already interested. There is school curriculum and public policy to protect from them, but areas where it's "whatever" just leave them be.
Those bomb vests are when they try to get it taught as school curriculum. That is where the battles must be fought. That Ark Park is silly, but it can only die in obscurity if it's left alone, instead of poked at, which will only entrench conservatives to keep fighting. It's what they want to believe, and they aren't trying to force it on anyone with that Park. Let them be the ones to waste resources on it. We have much more important battles to fight than wasting resources over such a silly thing and going with intentions that will very likely backfire. It's not easy leaving those beliefs behind, and it isn't any easier when there are fingers that mock and point instead of hands to guide.
No, I did not mean it as a joke. You see, I happen to believe that those who don't delude themselves with ancient mythology and superstition, and instead pay attention to and learn from what science can teach them, will have a very real, and quite possibly very terrible, advantage over those who wallow in self-imposed ignorance. And as a result, they will have better luck procreating, and that, I'm afraid, is all that evolution needs.
And where do you suppose he gets the money to do that? Evangelicals LOVE someone like Hamm who stands up directly against those who are against their beliefs. Even defying court orders and laws are praised when it's done in the name of god. There pamphlets about the Nye/Hamm debates would be frequently and widely covered, they would list all the reasons Nye and evolution are wrong, the Bible verses that defend their position, and then praise Hamm for "quoting the truth" and something to the extent of "fighting the Devil's lies about evolution."And a very slick Con Game that Hamm has created, could very well convince them that Creationism just isn't that bad, and maybe ought to be allowed in Science class.