• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Posters Need Better Monikers

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
@Shadow Wolf , sorry. No hard feelings. You can do one on me.

When you write a post type in @ and then the username. You do not even need to type in the whole name since the system will give suggestions. Once the name is entered hit post.

Then hit the edit key and where the person's name is spelled out replace that part with your made up moniker.
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
He who is not to banned, please? let's see if I can do that.

Yeah! Yes I can do it too.

Okay, same as before, type the asperand, I did not know that and apparently neither does Google spell check, with the person's user name that you want to change.

Hit post. Hit the edit button replace the @whomever bob, with the moniker that you want without the asperand. It is optional at that point.
 

lewisnotmiller

Grand Hat
Staff member
Premium Member
Whole thread is a disappointment to me. I came in here thinking it was discussing the obvious fact that posters need better monocles.

If I had better monocles, for instance, I would have seen that this thread wasn't about monocles at all, and I would have stayed away.
Although...if I HAD a better monocle, I wouldn't need to find a thread about better monocles, and so instead I might have entered this thread.

*ponders*

@Rev,writer of confusing monocle-related threads
 

JustGeorge

Not As Much Fun As I Look
Staff member
Premium Member
Whole thread is a disappointment to me. I came in here thinking it was discussing the obvious fact that posters need better monocles.

If I had better monocles, for instance, I would have seen that this thread wasn't about monocles at all, and I would have stayed away.
Although...if I HAD a better monocle, I wouldn't need to find a thread about better monocles, and so instead I might have entered this thread.

*ponders*

@Revoltingest

Nice to see you again!
 

Dan From Smithville

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
Staff member
Premium Member
I am Dan the Hyper Focused and Equally Capable of Quickly Losing Interest Only to Return for Reasons Even I Cannot Fathom. I am no relation to the Newport, Reasons Even I Cannot Fathom.
 
Top