Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nope, that's not the case as Fox is well established as basically being a mouthpiece for the right, and Murdock created it to be that way. Do they have a right to put that out and you have a right to post it, and the answer is yes.
The existence of Fox is at least some balance as the rest of the media are Leftist activist masquerading as journalists. For years the Left owned information dissemination, not anymore.
"False equivalencies" are not dealing with the truth, as numerous studies, the most recent one I've seen was from non-partisan PolitiFact, concluded that Fox news is the least accurate of all the national t.v. news outlets followed by MSNBC. It was essentially created that way by Murdock to reflect a more "conservative" source.
That hasn't been my experience, besides, how does one determine the accuracy of stories that they don't even report???
False. Again, you're using "false equivalency". The large t.v. networks tend to be only somewhat left of center in regards to bias but are quite good when it comes to accuracy.
It's called "science", and that's my main orientation.
Whatever your science is it didn't help you when dismissing the OP on this thread because you have a bias towards the source. The FOX news piece is about an op-ed written by the head of PP in the NYT.
Now you are being dishonest as I explained in a post a short while back why I commented the way I did on your OP. [post #21]
Was it though? I could see that the black population were often the most in need of its services. The poor are those that need that sort of help the most and there have been historically a higher percentage of black people among the poor largely due to the racist history of America. It is always easy to reinterpret quotes after the fact and make them appear to be more racists than they were.
ROTFLMAO
This is a misuse of "false equivalence".
Even if one race has more women freely choosing
I use to like FOX News, years and years ago. But they started to chase to go to the extremes. They use to be the conservative equivalent to CNN. Between the two you got a good balance. Then they became the conservative equivalent MSNBC. Still not too bad. Just a bit whacko. Then the Trump era began and they went off the rails. When the tried to correct for that after the last election and report honestly the Kool Aid drinkers were not having it and jumped ship to the other far right sources. At present there is a big gulf between the various degrees of left leaning sources and conservative sources. I don't know of any that are not crazy right currently.
You once liked Fox News?
The far right stuff makes my head hurt these days. When FOX lost Shepard Smith there was pretty much no longer a reason to watch the network.
I found Fox News too loud...all that Hannity & his ilk.
Yep, Hannity was not that bad when it was Hannity and Colmes. Hannity was to far right and Colmes was too far left for my taste. Between the two of them it worked. When it became Hannity only they lost me. And don't even start on O'Reilly.
CDC stats on annual black deaths
Even if we took these figures at face value, which we absolutely should not ( Fact check: Gov. Bryant's claims about abortion numbers, black women | Mississippi Today ) abortion across the board has declined for over 25 years. So saying that in 2019, black abortion was higher than black deaths because of a 48 year mean is simply untrue.