You're fooling nobody.
Can somebody pretend to be fooled? You’re all embarrassing me in front of the Secret Chief.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You're fooling nobody.
My sockpuppet is terrified of you.Can somebody pretend to be fooled? You’re all embarrassing me in front of the Secret Chief.
Neither. Just a general observation. *whistles*Who, me or @Meow Mix ?
My sockpuppet is terrified of you.
Feel better?
Don't blame me matey, blame the definition I provided (as and/or). I chose the right answer from the three alternatives supplied on our TV this morning so I probably had heard Philodox before but I'm no expert on such. But I am thinking of changing my name to this.Not to be ironically pedantic given the poll question, but I don't think the wording of the question is nuanced at all. I don't view being dogmatic and being argumentative as synonymous or even necessarily concomitant.
I have a lot of strong, firmly held beliefs myself, but whether or not I'm inclined to argue about them depends on context and perceived necessity. For example, if I were with a group of friends and one of them said something homophobic or racist, I'd be a lot more likely to show disapproval and try to get them not to do so in the future, ideally by convincing them why that was harmful, than I would be to argue just for the sake of it (as some people often do with other subjects online, which I don't judge them for as long as it's harmless and not in favor of willfully ignorant and malicious beliefs).
As for being dogmatic, I wouldn't count merely having firmly held opinions as such: to me, being dogmatic is more about one's approach and openness to evidence and logical reasoning than it is about firmness of conviction. Within that framework, I think I'm quite assertive and confident in many of my views but not dogmatic (or at least I try not to be, in that I strive to always be open to revising my views in light of logic and evidence).
Philodox, and possibly Philodoxy will be defined, but I thought I would introduce a new word to our vocabulary.
PHILODOX English Definition and Meaning | Lexico.com
So, to what extent do you see yourself as such? Myself, possibly 30%.
PS. If you are 0%, sorry about that, as only ten options are allowed.
I've voted 10% (since there is no 0%). I'm not at all argumentative. In fact I am very patient and try to educate my interlocutor any way possible so that s/he can see the way things really are (i.e. as I see them).Philodox, and possibly Philodoxy will be defined, but I thought I would introduce a new word to our vocabulary.
PHILODOX English Definition and Meaning | Lexico.com
So, to what extent do you see yourself as such? Myself, possibly 30%.
PS. If you are 0%, sorry about that, as only ten options are allowed.
I'm extremely dogmatic and argumentative, but people still love me for my charming nature and winning personality.
I've voted 10% (since there is no 0%). I'm not at all argumentative. In fact I am very patient and try to educate my interlocutor any way possible so that s/he can see the way things really are (i.e. as I see them).