Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is not obtainable with the technology we already have and I proposed to use. I.e. hydrogen fusion with refueling by trapping inter solar hydrogen. At about 20% the drag produced by collecting hydrogen limits further acceleration.and the other 80% of c...?
and you did the math?....acceleration to maintain 1g
so....you go faster and fasterSee the wiki article I linked to for the maths: Space travel using constant acceleration - Wikipedia
you will feel your weight in the seat ONLY
if acceleration is increasing
(the ship would be facing the direction from which you came)
so....you go faster and faster
and eventually faster than light?
all the while maintaining 1g?
We are imprisoned here on this blue planet like Napoleon was on St. Helena. No where much to go.In general, what do you think of space travel and living in space or on other heavenly bodies other than earth?
dude....you turn the ship aroundYou feel weight as long as you're accelerating (your velocity is increasing).
That would be very silly and impractical (you'd need propulsion units at both ends).
fair to say...there are no straight lines of travelYes.
No.
Yes.
You maintain proper acceleration and therefore follow a hyperbolic path through space-time.
dude....you turn the ship around
so.....if ever you achieve the speed of light
you will still float in your ship
take the distance you want to coverIf that were possible (which it isn't), you'd then be experiencing no time, so you wouldn't.
The point is that you can maintain a constant proper acceleration, which will give you 1g, indefinitely without ever reaching light-speed. Proper acceleration is basically constant acceleration in an instantaneously co-moving frame of reference. So at every instant in the journey, if you viewed things from a non-accelerating frame of reference that was at rest relative to you at that instant, you would be accelerating at a constant rate.
take the distance you want to cover
figure your weight (mass)
against a speed to maintain 1g
the greater the distance
the greater the TIME of acceleration
and SPEED MUST increase continually
so.....if the distance is great enough
you will eventually obtain the speed of light
and float in your ship
or....fail to obtain the speed of light
and float in your ship
where are you getting this?it takes 18g to escape earth's gravity
44g to escape the solar gravity
1g is a crawl
a college course I took a few years agowhere are you getting this?
well, either you were misinformed, or you've misremembered...G's are not relevant to escape velocity, which is what it sounded like you were talking about...a college course I took a few years ago
titled....the Known Universe
it was a quick overview of various items we are sure of
a college course I took a few years ago
titled....the Known Universe
it was a quick overview of various items we are sure of
Maintaining the necessary thrust (aka hovering) is accelerating (at 9.81 m/s^2 on earth).It, or more likely you, are wrong. You'd have to make other assumptions about the vehicle itself before you could arrive at an acceleration.
Even escape velocity only applies to a non-propelled object. You could escape the Earth at walking pace, with no acceleration at all*, if you could maintain the necessary thrust (exactly balancing the weight).
Escape velocity applies to orbital mechanics. It depends on the mass of the object you're circling and the distance from the object.A rocket, continuously accelerated by its exhaust, need not reach ballistic escape velocity at any distance since it is supplied with additional kinetic energy by the expulsion of its reaction mass. It can achieve escape at any speed, given a suitable mode of propulsion and sufficient propellant to provide the accelerating force on the object to escape
* After you've reached walking pace, that is.