Chisti
Active Member
The answer to this problem, as with all others, is to vote for Democrats.
Now it's my turn to :biglaugh:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The answer to this problem, as with all others, is to vote for Democrats.
I obtained it from Fox News this AM. However, since numerous members of this site deplore Fox New and say "they lie". I will give you link to the Huffpost World:Source?
Isn't it true that democrats have started more wars than republicans? Just asking out of curiosity...
When did we originally get a DNA sample from Osama to match this sample to? News is now saying DNA analysis confirms it was him.
I still don't understand dumping the whole body thing. Just thinking back on American history notorious criminals were often exhibited in state as proof. You think someone of this notorious caliber wouldn't have been what.......kicked out of a helicopter over the ocean? Not sure exactly how the body was disposed of.
You do not really believe that those in power ever would allow the entire human population free access to such a source of energy? :no:I think a clean, cheap universal source of energy that the entire human population could access would reduce much conflict. It would not put an end to ethnco-centric strife though it could reduce it.
Of course, such a source seems like magic.
It was buried at sea to keep within "Muslim guidelines" that a body be buried within a day of dying. Why at sea instead of in the ground is beyond me.
I think a clean, cheap universal source of energy that the entire human population could access would reduce much conflict. It would not put an end to ethnco-centric strife though it could reduce it.
I think this killing of Bin Laden makes the US look weak.
First it took so long to get him, then when they do he is killed quietly and his body dumped in the dark.
That just does not look like the behaviour of a strong, confident government. It looks like something from the Sopranoes.
A strong country would have arrested him, tried him and if it wanted him dead executed him in a public manner.
Roosevelt OK'd the embargo against Japan, which arguably precipitated the Pearl Harbor attack.WW2 - Roosevelt - Demo (Although dunno if you can really count this one, considering we were dragged into the war by Japan. Who knows if we would have entered had it not been for Pearl Harbor.)
I think this killing of Bin Laden makes the US look weak.
First it took so long to get him, then when they do he is killed quietly and his body dumped in the dark.
That just does not look like the behaviour of a strong, confident government. It looks like something from the Sopranoes.
A strong country would have arrested him, tried him and if it wanted him dead executed him in a public manner.
I think this killing of Bin Laden makes the US look weak.
First it took so long to get him, then when they do he is killed quietly and his body dumped in the dark.
That just does not look like the behaviour of a strong, confident government. It looks like something from the Sopranoes.
A strong country would have arrested him, tried him and if it wanted him dead executed him in a public manner.
Get over it. The guy was not worse than any other politician round the corner. To call him 'evil' makes little sense, unless of course we call every politician evil.
Do you excuse Osama's actions based on the above statement?
Do you excuse Bush's actions? Would you celebrate if someone were to assassinate him?
You did not answer my question.
But to answer yours, no, I hold Bush fully responsible for mishandling the war in Afghanistan, and for starting an unnecessary way in Iraq.
Would I celebrate his assassination? No, but I would support a complete investigation into his actions, and a trial if evidence was found of war crimes.
Now, back to my question.
Do you excuse Osama's actions based on your "not worse than any other politician" statement?
Do you celebrate OBL's killing, then?
The Special forces of all major countries eliminate many leaders of factions around the world. It is never given any publicity. Politically Osama had to be shown to be dead.
A trial would have given him free publicity for years, and holding him would have put thousands in danger.
We will now have the opportunity to pick off those extremists, who come out of the woodwork to take revenge.
I think it makes the US look relentless.
I dont think he would have given up i think he fought to the death rather than be put on display and killed on pay per view.
I wouldn't want to waste any public money protecting his grave 24/7 what a spit in the face that would be?
An ignominious end ! kind of fitting in my book.
As for how long it took to get him? well how easy is it to find something right next to you when its in the pocket of a so called friend all along.
I think the world would be a lesser place if the Nuremburg Trials had never happened.
Following the logic you express above Terry wouldn't all the Nazi leaders have been taken to the woods and shot?
Seems more Stalin than Churchill to me.
That was never going to happen Stephen. Osama gave orders for his own men to kill him if capture was eminent.