Is that their fault?Pet rocks were more earth shaking.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Is that their fault?Pet rocks were more earth shaking.
I'm pretty sure its a prank. Male and female chairs. I don't know if they're pranking feminists or men, but its a prank.
I saw this yesterday. She wins an award for making a chair to prevent men to prevent "manspreading" from taking up others personal space but also invented a chair for women to encourage "womanspreading" to encourage women to take up other people personal space? ROFLMAO
Did at any point anyone say to her just use a chair with armrest.
View attachment 31123
Who doesn't? I don't want to look at other people's junk. I have my own junk to look at.Clearly she has an issue with male genitalia.
I don't. I don't happen to look at men's crotches in public.Who doesn't? I don't want to look at other people's junk.
Well, hopefully neither other peoples junk or yours is out when seated in a chair in a public place.I have my own junk to look at.
My take on this is that it's more about performance art than furniture design.
I don't think the judges were actually that smart.She's a Misandrist.
She created a chair to stop manspreading, but invented one to encourage womenspreading. Clearly she has an issue with male genitalia.
That isn't in the article. "Don't take these chairs too seriously." In fact just the opposite.My take on this is that it's more about performance art than furniture design.
Even the designer said something like "Don't take these chairs too seriously."
You clearly didn't read the article.I think her goal was to draw attention to her more serious designs by making stuff that got people talking and giggling. She used a real, if insignificant, problem to get her name known by the people she wanted to notice her work. Apparently, it worked brilliantly. It got her free advertising such as this thread.
Tom
That isn't in the article. "Don't take these chairs too seriously." In fact just the opposite.
You clearly didn't read the article.
That's what she said.The graduate says that her design is not to be taken too seriously but admits that the chairs do give a “physicality to an issue women face in quite a fun yet literal way”.
Clearly she didn't read the article she cited.That's what she said.
Tom
I don't think the judges were actually that smart.She's a Misandrist.
She created a chair to stop manspreading, but invented one to encourage womenspreading. Clearly she has an issue with male genitalia.
Clearly I did. Did you?Clearly she didn't read the article she cited.
Then why didn't you spot this?:Clearly I did. Did you?
Shhh, that's next years award winner. Don't give it away.What about a chair with a system of ropes and pulleys that will bind the legs together and improve posture? They can also serve as props for extemporaneous amateur comedy sketches. That would reduce the carbon footprint by about 47% over having two different chairs for each task.
That's not the same as what the member had stated about the seriousness.Then why didn't you spot this?:
The graduate says that her design is not to be taken too seriously but admits that the chairs do give a “physicality to an issue women face in quite a fun yet literal way”.
He said: Even the designer said something like "Don't take these chairs too seriously."That's not the same as what the member had stated about the seriousness.
Yes it is. It's almost verbatim.That's not the same as what the member had stated about the seriousness.
Don't let a plumber sit in that thing.And you probably thought this was going to be talking about a Feminist in California.
Feminist who created chair to stop ‘manspreading’ wins design award
Not much competition huh? She's been commissioned to create a product for a hotel and leisure company.