But that is the thing Lightkeeper was saying... pair-bonding is natural. So why can't we just pair bond? Why must we "get married", taking one another's last names, getting tax breaks, etc. There are some practical aspects to marriage... the right of both parents to have a say in how children are raised, the ability to split up property upon the dissolution of the marriage... etc. But I personally think marriage should be for anyone... a man and a woman, a woman and a woman, a man and a man, or even a group of consenting adults. The idea that marriage must be an institution in which a man and a woman are legally bound together and are expected to have children (even if they chose not to) is stupid and medieval. I don't think we should get rid of marriage, but I do think we should change the way we look at it. It is a decision between consenting adults to become a legal unit because they love each other and want to form a family (and that family does NOT have to include children! It just has to be people who want to live together, share responsibilities, support one another, etc.)