• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

New Website: mormonsfor8.com

Alceste

Vagabond
As for everyone else's confusion about what this website is about, perhaps it's only something that Mormons can readily see. You and I look at the website and it's obvious to us what they're doing — especially when you look at their blogroll! But perhaps it relies too much on in-group allusions and references for folks who aren't part of our subculture to catch — not obvious in-group references like PPIs and BYCs and that kind of thing, but still perhaps a certain tone that only communicates properly to people who are already used to a particular melody.

How do you see anything other than objectivity from the blogroll? There are both "pro" and "con" links.

It's just a list. As they say, the info on it could be used by anyone. Some Mormons will look at it and think they're not keeping up with the Joneses, so to speak, and donate more. Civil rights advocates might avoid doing business with companies listed on the database, or be annoyed if somebody they know happens to be on there, but I don't see how it's at all nefarious by design.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Post 47. I am seeing the picture now when I look at it.
You may be looking at the image in your cache or something like that. It doesn't show up for the rest of us.

Nor me.

Are you linking from the original site? Try putting it on photobucket and linking from there.
Depending on the originating site's rules and Terms of Service, they may not permit this. It'd be simpler to provide a link to the original page where the image appeared anyhow.
 

Apex

Somewhere Around Nothing
I uploaded it to Imageshack and then linked to it from there. It should be showing up for everyone. This is the first time its ever done this for me. Kind of strange...
 

The Voice of Reason

Doctor of Thinkology
I uploaded it to Imageshack and then linked to it from there. It should be showing up for everyone. This is the first time its ever done this for me. Kind of strange...

Sorry Apex, but it still doesn't show up. The placeholder is there, but no photograph (or whatever it is).
 

Worshipper

Active Member
How do you see anything other than objectivity from the blogroll? There are both "pro" and "con" links.
I think you have to be a Mormon, and thoroughly acculturated in the Mormon community at that, to see it. I don't know how to help someone who isn't a Mormon see it.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
I think you have to be a Mormon, and thoroughly acculturated in the Mormon community at that, to see it. I don't know how to help someone who isn't a Mormon see it.

Are you saying Mormons wrote the site exposing Mormons using specially coded euphemisms for persecuting Mormons that only Mormons understand?

I'm confused! :areyoucra
 

The Voice of Reason

Doctor of Thinkology
Are you saying Mormons wrote the site exposing Mormons using specially coded euphemisms for persecuting Mormons that only Mormons understand?

I'm confused! :areyoucra

No, no, no, Alceste. This thread is about Merman's - specifically, Ethel Merman.

Carry on.
 

Worshipper

Active Member
Are you saying Mormons wrote the site exposing Mormons using specially coded euphemisms for persecuting Mormons that only Mormons understand?

I'm confused! :areyoucra
Something like that. Your wording (particularly "specially coded euphemisms") seems to me to imply too much agency in the whole process, but you are essentially right.

Like most subcultures, Mormondom has its own naturally-occurring semiotic codes that insiders are quite familiar with but that outsiders are oblivious to. This site's use of those codes makes it clear to an insider what side they're on.

This really isn't a rare or unusual thing at all. All segments of society have their own linguistic and other semiotic codes, and insiders always use those codes to send messages that can only be interpreted by insiders. At a broad level, English, Spanish, Arabic, Russian, and so forth are all such codes, and they are used to pass messages to insiders but are unintelligible to outsiders. But the same thing functions at narrower levels in all our lives every day.
 
This isn't about trying to get other Mormons to donate. It's about harassing those who have.
No, it's about transparency in our democracy and public record. If the website encouraged people to harass Mormons who donate, that would be wrong. If anyone does harass Mormons who donate, that is wrong. But disseminating public information is fine.

You know what WON'T happen to any of the people who contributed thousands of dollars to Prop 8? They won't have their marriage licenses taken away. But that will happen to 18,000 married couples in California, many of whom have children. That's not defending families, it's attacking families, and it is bigotry plain and simple.

The website demonstrates that the LDS Church's encouragement to Mormons to support Prop 8 was extremely successful. Mormons donated $14.8 million in contributions of over $1,000 each. That's nearly half of all such contributions.
 
Top