Audie
Veteran Member
Well I didn't mention atheism or say that I thought that about atheism.
Perhaps there is truth to this.
However, I would also argue that accepting the premise that nothing whatsoever has any greater meaning and therefore we should STOP asking "why?" to each new question is also potentially "childish". I ask "why?" because my soul burns with the question of why it all exists and whether or not any of it means anything or not. I think simply accepting that nothing has meaning because it is convenient to do so and because of a lack of evidence to the contrary is perhaps just lazy.
From an atheistic perspective I can see the lack of a need to answer the question of "why?" because from that perspective there's no NEED for a why. I am the type of person who seeks out knowledge and information so if I were an atheist my big question would probably be "how?" rather than "why?". From a theistic perspective the idea of a creator answers the "how?" but introduces the "why?"
Childish could perhaps be fitting term, but as someone who sits up at night wondering about the nature of reality I can't simply just shrug my shoulders and forget about it all and go back to my day job in the matrix, I'll always wonder.
I know you did not mention atheism. From what you say,
though, you quite clearly do not see what an atheist
prrspevtive would be. You kind of got the "why" thing
backwards, for one
You might think where the truth in what I said is, rather than
shrug it off with "perhaps" and going straight to a counterargument
Seeking answers, and all.
I will look into a more complete response if you indicate
interest.
Mean while, if @Christine or another wishes to fill in
some blanks, they are encouraged to do so.
ETA, the lie-awake does sound like mind-trap.
Last edited: