Master Vigil
Well-Known Member
So much of my research brings me to the understanding that mostly all nature based religions were developed within poor cultures and societies. Take the tribal religions. Their whole lives were based on their natural surroundings. The jungle, forests, the hunt. Their survival was dependent on nature and what nature produced. This even affects those who are poor and living in civilization. Take for instance the romani, and sinti gypsies. Very poor, and only made money from hunting, trading, wood work, metal work, and things that nature provided. It isn't hard to see that their religious beliefs were very nature based as well. If riches cloud the mind and demean the soul, would the poor and nature based religions be the true ways to practice? After the primal religions left, the basic religious difference was the idea of self, above and apart from nature. Is this egotistical idea hindering those who hold it from achieving enlightenment and true happiness?