• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

My views on LHP

1137

Here until I storm off again
Premium Member
I wasn't suggesting that all LHPers seek the same goal under different names. I'm admitting that LHPers seek different goals and attempted to put that under a single name: enlightenment.

I meant I think the term "LHP" is irrelevant.
 

Saint Frankenstein

Wanderer From Afar
Premium Member
I think it's irrelevant, too. The fighting and debates in this DIR lately show that we can't even agree on what it is. Doesn't matter to me, anyway. I'm a Satanist, first and foremost, and I have my own views on that. Satanism just got thrown into the LHP menagerie by some occultists that are long dead. It doesn't matter really matter anymore, imo.
 
LHP means what it has always meant, since thousands of years ago when it was coined. That some modern 'would be's' cant coherently justify it's usage vis a vis the incoherent mess they might be calling 'satanism' or 'luciferianism' or <insert ism here> is neither here nor there.
 

1137

Here until I storm off again
Premium Member
Ah. Why is that?

It's more a subculture now. Umbrella labels don't really work. Like I can say I'm a archetypal Luciferian and it means something. We prove that the LHP label has and unstable meaning and the interpretations can vary drastically.

These days, I think the LHP label is often a sign of arrogance, immaturity, self delusion, etc - ideas I do not respect except handled certain ways. We have members here alone - and thousands in the world - who belong to orders claiming to be LHP yet hold you to others' standards (self delusion). We have the nobodies who live off government funds, try to be goth, and label themselves LHP for fear induction or ego boost. Others simply want to shock and frighten. These are not socially evolved individuals, they are an immature reaction to society rather than a new force of change. Yet they fall into LHP same as you, Iti, myself, twig, infinitum, Scotty, etc. I say BS.
 
We prove that the LHP label has and unstable meaning and the interpretations can vary drastically.
So because some people came along and misunderstood the definition of LHP, that somehow invalidates the actual definition?

The LHP is what it is; shattering duality through nastika/heterodox practice. Vama='to the left' Chara='path or course.'
 

1137

Here until I storm off again
Premium Member
So because some people came along and misunderstood the definition of LHP, that somehow invalidates the actual definition?

The LHP is what it is; shattering duality through nastika/heterodox practice. Vama='to the left' Chara='path or course.'

Philosophies evolve. That's not to say you can't hold onto dark age (/ high school) ideologies of heterodoxy as some form of enlightenment, but it has no real depth.
 
If you say so.

If you think using LHP as some catch all identity marker, with no distinguishing substance or praxis unto itself has more "real depth" than a tradition that has been practiced in some form or other for a score of centuries, that is your right.

People believe all sorts of weird things.
 

1137

Here until I storm off again
Premium Member
If you say so.

If you think using LHP as some catch all identity marker, with no distinguishing substance or praxis unto itself has more "real depth" than a tradition that has been practiced in some form or other for a score of centuries, that is your right.

People believe all sorts of weird things.

I don't, which is why I said the term has becomre pointless.
 
Top