I wasn't suggesting that all LHPers seek the same goal under different names. I'm admitting that LHPers seek different goals and attempted to put that under a single name: enlightenment.
I meant I think the term "LHP" is irrelevant.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I wasn't suggesting that all LHPers seek the same goal under different names. I'm admitting that LHPers seek different goals and attempted to put that under a single name: enlightenment.
I meant I think the term "LHP" is irrelevant.
Ah. Why is that?
So because some people came along and misunderstood the definition of LHP, that somehow invalidates the actual definition?We prove that the LHP label has and unstable meaning and the interpretations can vary drastically.
So because some people came along and misunderstood the definition of LHP, that somehow invalidates the actual definition?
The LHP is what it is; shattering duality through nastika/heterodox practice. Vama='to the left' Chara='path or course.'
If you say so.
If you think using LHP as some catch all identity marker, with no distinguishing substance or praxis unto itself has more "real depth" than a tradition that has been practiced in some form or other for a score of centuries, that is your right.
People believe all sorts of weird things.