Wildswanderer
Veteran Member
All evidence for everything can be seen as subjective. Shrug.Yeah, that is your subjective understanding. I have another subjective understanding.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
All evidence for everything can be seen as subjective. Shrug.Yeah, that is your subjective understanding. I have another subjective understanding.
All evidence for everything can be seen as subjective. Shrug.
Everything is not you? What does that even mean?No, not quite. Everything is not you, you are a part and the rest is objective as not you. If you can show that everything is you, then yes. If no, then I can get away believing in the objective and thus it works. So it is both subjective and objective and that is what the world is. You and the rest. The rest is objective.
Then you are not me.Everything is not you? What does that even mean?
Maybe I'm just an illusion.
Quite a coincidence. The gods of theists tend to have the same morals as the believer. If only the believers agreed with each other.All I know is that the one true God has the same morals as me.
This is understanding what Christian dogma teaches. It isn't a factual set of ideas. Most people have the biological trait to adopt religious norms from society, but as we see this varies from one person to the next. Non-believers don't have this trait.I think the reality is that each person is at a different place in their personal experiences and understanding, so everyone comes to different conclusions. My understanding is that God the Creator desires all to be saved from sin, come to Him and have eternal life. From my experience, I know I was spiritually blind and living in darkness until I actually realized I needed a Savior and trusted Jesus Christ. Before that time though, I did experience times where I had close calls with harm, but some power intervened and I was spared.
As an atheist I have had similar experiences of intuition. Why does it suggest a supernatural at work? I am skeptical of a supernatural phenomenon, like a loving God, since we see so many children not being saved by miracles in cancer wards. It might be that some folks just have a natural sense of impending danger just like other animals do.A non-Christian friend shared an amazing experience with me years ago. She was at a spiritual, new age retreat. One night she was asleep alone in her tent out in the forest. She said “someone” shook her arm, woke her up and said, Get Out! She quickly got out of her tent just before a large tree fell on it. She didn’t see anyone around... but her life was saved.
From my perspective, God sent an angel to save her life and give her further time and opportunity to trust Jesus as her Savior because as the Bible says that He’s...
...not willing that any should perish but that all should come to repentance. 2 Peter 3:9
I know I was spared and given more opportunities to come to understand and realize I needed the Savior.
...
So, I ask believers who have opinions of nonbelievers having spiritual awakenings, has there been any where the person did not have preexisting knowledge of God?...
Those who claimed to have been an atheist and became a theist were never atheists for intellectual reasons, they just weren't religious.I knew a person who came to Planet Baha'i. Nothing special had happened, but he woke up one day and went from atheist to a believer in God. Her felt a connection to God he claimed. He had what I would consider strange theology about God. His understanding evolved over time, and after a while heard nothing from him again. Have no idea how he ended up. He was a speed reader and read the whole Old Testament and New Testament in a short amount of time, and at first concluded that the Old Testament God was not the same God as the New Testament. Then he changed his mind. I don't know where he evolved from there.
Those who come to be actively religious are at a point in life they are devoid of meaning and are seeking connection with others, and religion is an easy way to access a community. Religions are also highly tribal, so that really attracts a person in need of feeling belonging.My conclusion is that anyone can be spiritually awakened. He didn't try to convert us to his theology. The fact that he didn't try to convert us means to me that he did have a genuine spiritual awakening.
Yet we see artifacts from primitive people of how they symbolized animals and other aspects of nature. Gods are just symbolic forms of humans. The God of Abraham is highly based on the patriarchal ideal of a mortal leader. God is male, he sits on a throne, he has emotions with both vices and virtues, etc. It's called anthropomorphism.I think that is interesting question. Difficult to know. Would be nice to know how people got the first idea of God. In atheistic point of view, I have understood that, at some point some human just thought it is nice idea to start to speak about god. In that case person would not have had preexisting knowledge, so where would the idea have come? I don't know, but by what I have seen, people usually are really poor to imagine anything that they have not seen or heard. This is why I believe the idea of God is not from humans.
That's why we value objective methods and evidence over subjectivity.All evidence for everything can be seen as subjective. Shrug.
I never thought I was, lol!Then you are not me.
I never thought I was, lol!
Such as?That's why we value objective methods and evidence over subjectivity.
No, there is an almost infinite number of parts to the world.So there are 2 parts to the world, you and the rest.
No, there is an almost infinite number of parts to the world.
Such as science. Reputable journalism. Court cases. One's own search for truth.Such as?
This is all about one's own search for truth. Journalism? Really? Science changes all the time. What does a court case even have to do with the subject?That's why we value objective methods and evidence over subjectivity.
Such as science. Reputable journalism. Court cases. One's own search for truth.
You don't think nature is evidence?And that is your subjective belief without evidence?
Then why does he make it so difficult for this to happen? Why does he put so many obstacles in the way?
It's like a teacher saying they want everyone to get an A+ in a test, but then gives most of the class the wrong book to revise from.
Why do you think he has repeatedly taken the time to spare you from harm, but ignores the prayers of millions of parents whose children are suffering and dying? Why are you so special? (It's this kind of self-centred dismissal of the suffering of others by some religionists that is so distasteful)
Without any corroborative evidence, such stories can be dismissed.
This is just the Texas Sharpshooter fallacy. Millions perish without repentance every day. Why doesn't he save them as well?
Thanks for your thoughts.This is understanding what Christian dogma teaches. It isn't a factual set of ideas. Most people have the biological trait to adopt religious norms from society, but as we see this varies from one person to the next. Non-believers don't have this trait.
Believers don't existence God. They create experiences from what they learn from the religious influence.
As an atheist I have had similar experiences of intuition. Why does it suggest a supernatural at work? I am skeptical of a supernatural phenomenon, like a loving God, since we see so many children not being saved by miracles in cancer wards. It might be that some folks just have a natural sense of impending danger just like other animals do.