And an example from one or a few countries makes the case for monarchies, rather than for any other proper system that represents the interests of the people as a whole? Surely one can't argue against having the best qualified, and those having the best interests of the whole country in mind whilst being in any leadership position. This is hardly guaranteed under monarchies (almost not in fact historically) and we don't get to vote them out. It's more luck than anything to get a good one - like Queen Elizabeth. And for me, it is about all the associated stuff - Lords and Ladies, etc., and the House of Lords and such. We could do without these too.