True. Everyone rejects the fact that Jesus never commanded the making of disciples to fulfill what is written, the whole world in satan lies.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Misquote in the Gospel
- Thread starter JohnAmes
- Start date
kjw47
Well-Known Member
You have-- a total of 0 you know about me and my personal life.
Ask a question, I will answer for free.
Can I read? LOL It is written as a question. A question is not a promise! Matthew 24:45
You don't even have a shred of evidence that Matthew 24:45 isn't just another parable.
How do you know that you are right and that I am wrong?
You speak the truth here! Good for you! Yes, nobody can say who will endure to the end, but you are putting all your trust in that the Jehovah's Witnesses who are faithful to the Jehovah's Witnesses will endure to the end. I am sure it is why you go door to door!
kjw47
Well-Known Member
I didn't say or ask if could be "undone" kjw. Why can't you stay on point?
You stated repentance = correction remember?
Also, do you remember me pointing this out to you in my last post? I specifically asked if you could remember what you told me before..."repentance = correction"! There was nothing about "undone".
I didn't ask if the Nazis had "undone" the murder of 6 million Jews by turning off the gas. I asked if the Nazis had "repented" by turning off the gas.
By your definition, any Nazis that had shot a Jew can "repent" by merely "correcting" his behavior. You stated "correction" was all that was needed. So if a Nazi "corrects" his behavior by no longer shooting Jews, he has, by your Organization's twisted doctrine, "repented".
That kjw, is an incredibly bigoted statement. It was the Nazis under Hitler, not Catholics under the Pope, that attacked Poland to start World War 2. Also, you seem to ignore the approximately 15-20,000 Jehovah Witnesses who decided they were better off staying out of the camps.
Look, I'll make this easy for you. We're going to take an exercise in critical thinking, okay? Let's review your statement again because I was told the exact same thing by another bigoted religious Organization, the Black Muslims, some 40 years ago. Only they had a slightly different slant on things:
See how easy bigotry is kjw?CatholicismCaucasians backed Hitler to the hilt--voted him into power, then killed the members of their ownreligionrace in everyChristianland Hitler attacked.
I simply substituted "Christians" with "Caucasians"! Believe me, there are plenty of people who fell for this argument, hook, line and sinker. The problems of the world weren't caused by "Christendom" but by the "white devils" who warred, colonized and factionalized everything else. They told me whites backed Hitler "100%", just like you told me Catholics did earlier.
Do you think the Black Muslims had a valid argument? Or do you feel a sudden sense of outrage or unease when you're lumped into the same deleterious pot?
Perhaps you can explain to us why, using clear terms and rationale, the Black Muslims were wrong, and also, on what basis we should find your Organization's anti-Christian bigotry more "truthful" and appealing.
The real teachers of Jesus would--NEVER-- allow the followers to stand on both sides blowing each others heads off--the world surely could never see--love amongst themselves out of them.
Every race does every sin--none are excluded.
I seriously doubt 6 million dead could ever be forgiven by God. They had no right. skin color has 0 to do with it--God created one human family. the bigoted hearts keep bringing up skin color on matters. The worlds hearts--thrive on it.
kjw47
Well-Known Member
Exactly right--that is why th
that is why the NWT corrected all the errors translated in by Catholicism to fit false council teachings.
All? Are you saying the translators of the New World Translation were perfect men?
Saying that you WILL answer puts you under the obligation to answer. If you do not answer me everyone reading the this (the three or possibly four) will realize that you just might be a liar.
How do you know that you are right and that I am wrong?
Is he on another planet? Oh, sorry, that is another religion.
My question is a Bible question @kjw. You DID say you would answer me.
The governing body of Jehovah's Witnesses search the scriptures to reason on them.
Why don't they hear from Jesus?
Does the fact that they don't hear from the risen Jesus Christ make it also true that I don't hear from the risen Christ?
The governing body of Jehovah's Witnesses search the scriptures to reason on them.
Why don't they hear from Jesus?
Does the fact that they don't hear from the risen Jesus Christ make it also true that I don't hear from the risen Christ?
@kjw How do you know that Matthew 24:45 is a prophecy and not a parable?
Hmmm... you made statements without proof. Why can you do it but I can't?
The did a better j ob but you still have a faulty translation.
The Catholics did not translate any of the good translations of today/
kjw47
Well-Known Member
kjw47
Well-Known Member
Oeste
Well-Known Member
So if I see Jews being escorted to a gas chamber I should do nothing but show love for what is taking place? Or is it better if keep a straight face and go back to reading my paper?
It seems to me that you're saying the Germans showed love to the world by turning a blind eye and doing nothing to stop the Nazi executions.
We're doing some critical thinking here, remember? Let's look at it again:
Is this correct, or is one religion excluded? And if you can brush off the sins of one religion, why can't the Black Muslims brush off the sins of one race?
So you no longer allow Germans into your congregation?
But the Black Muslims assured me that skin color had everything to do with it, and as exhibit A they offered World War 2, exhibit B was World War 1, exhibit C was the American Indian genocide, Exhibit D was Afro-Asian colonization, slavery and so on. Why is blaming it on skin color bigoted but blaming it on Catholics "truth"? Shouldn't it be the other way around, or are both teachings equally bigoted?
Let's go back to our critical thinking exercise and your former comment to KenS about "disagreement without proof = 0":
See how easy that is?
Look, the Black Muslims have just left my house after presenting "Mohammed Speaks". They've assured me the world is a mess because of skin color, and they point to all the wars. Then you just pull up with the latest issue of the Watchtower. You've just assured me it's due to the Catholic religion, and you point to the exact same wars.
Why is your truth any less bigoted from theirs? And what happens when my neighbor reads your literature and concludes you were both half right and it was really white Catholics who messed up everything? Why isn't his new "truth" even more believable than yours?
I'm sure you have plenty of proof that shows being white, European or German had nothing to do with the war, but being Catholic surely did. I'm just waiting for you to present it.
kjw47
Well-Known Member
By the time any one else translated all originals were gone--Catholicism translating remained and Hebrew translating which contradicts trinity translations.. all of them are the works of Catholicism translating.--1000 years after the councils were held they finally allowed translating by others. They burned their own members alive if they tried to translate prior to that.