# Mathematical proof of the existence of God

Discussion in 'Games / Pics / Jokes / Stories' started by Nakosis, Feb 23, 2021.

1. ### Nakosis crystal soldier Premium Member

Joined:
Nov 16, 2011
Messages:
17,339
Ratings:
+7,854
Religion:
Atheist Libertarian
Beginning with the unitarity of quantum probability you find the non-vanishing deism coefficient manifest.

The set of neononontological logical absolutes is provably finite, whereas the set of Descartian, or singly self referencing (once recursive), logical postulates is substantially larger. For example, permitting God to create an object so big that he can’t move it, while simultaneously noting that (being all powerful) he can certainly move it, is a statement contained within the Descartian set, and outside of standard (mortal) logic. By necessity, the more all encompassing logic is infinitely larger.

Indeed, using a Cantorian decomposition on the larger set one can clearly see the smaller set made apparent. That is to say, the restrictions of mortal absolutes form a fractal “Chopra surface” on the larger set in “absolutes space”.

The quasimobius structure of absolutes space is established by the most basic mathematical inference. So, once a single point in the Descartian volume has been established, then the remainder of the set follows immediately by Godelian extension. But, keep in mind that the initial premise is based on quantum unitarity (which has been mathematically and experimentally proven), and as such, the projection hypothesis holds.

The “projection hypothesis”, an inescapable result of modern quantum theory, postulates that consciousness is an integral part of the structure of the universe. Moreover, according to Alan Sokal, a PhD physics professor from New York city, “…the distinction between observer and observed; the π of Euclid and the G of Newton, formerly thought to be constant and universal, are now perceived in their ineluctable historicity; and the putative observer becomes fatally de-centered, disconnected from any epistemic link to a space-time point that can no longer be defined by geometry alone.” (reference)

Therefore, by psuedodyadicism, the existence of any consciousness capable of comprehending an almighty or all-encompassing system, induces (technically: “projects”) a “pocket” into absolutes space, establishing an interior point, allowing for the divining of the existence of the whole of the set of Descartian absolutes. Obviously, this only strictly implies the existence of neoDescartian absolutes, but the paleoDescartian set follows immediately.

Obviously, the ratio of the q-measure of the higher postulates to the totality of absolutes space is the probability that those higher postulates hold in our universe. (This technique is common practice in most of the scientific community, but is almost unheard of in physics circles, which are mired in orthodoxy.)

But, having a higher dimensionality than the set of mortal absolutes (being circular, they have a dimension of $[​IMG]$) implies immediately that the ratio is 1-1. I.e., an almighty consciousness capable of everything must necessarily exist. QED

Of course this only holds for our universe.
Mathematical proof of the existence of God.

Obviously.

#1
• Funny x 7
• Winner x 1
• Informative x 1
2. ### sun rise "This is the Hour of God" Premium Member

Joined:
Apr 28, 2014
Messages:
55,627
Ratings:
+25,111
Religion:
Love
My proof is simpler:

Equals multiplied by equals the result must be equal:
God is infinite
Infinity times any number equals infinity.
Thus God alone exists and everything else is an illusion.
QED

#2
• Winner x 1
• Useful x 1
3. ### dybmh Terminal Optimist Premium Member

Joined:
Jan 6, 2019
Messages:
8,399
Ratings:
+5,692
Religion:
Judaism
God as I define it exists for me.

#3
• Like x 1
4. ### Nakosis crystal soldier Premium Member

Joined:
Nov 16, 2011
Messages:
17,339
Ratings:
+7,854
Religion:
Atheist Libertarian
Doesn't everyone?

#4
5. ### dybmh Terminal Optimist Premium Member

Joined:
Jan 6, 2019
Messages:
8,399
Ratings:
+5,692
Religion:
Judaism
don't think too deeply about it...

#5
• Funny x 1
• Winner x 1
6. ### exchemist Veteran Member

Joined:
Apr 24, 2018
Messages:
11,313
Ratings:
+10,352
Religion:
RC (culturally at least)
I notice you have interpolated a fractal Chopra surface. Nice one!

#6
• Winner x 2
• Friendly x 1
7. ### Heyo Well-Known Member

Joined:
Aug 1, 2019
Messages:
5,952
Ratings:
+4,939
Religion:
none
Deepak, is that you?

#7
• Winner x 1
8. ### Heyo Well-Known Member

Joined:
Aug 1, 2019
Messages:
5,952
Ratings:
+4,939
Religion:
none
God, as I define it, exists objectively. It's simple, really:

1. Clapton is god.
2. Clapton objectively exists.
3. Therefore god objectively exists.

#8
• Like x 1
9. ### Brickjectivity Veteran Member Staff MemberPremium Member

Joined:
Dec 8, 2012
Messages:
30,561
Ratings:
+11,444
Religion:
liber-scripta grim Christian
Oh its a joke thread. You got me! Here I was getting all interested...and then bam.

#9