gnostic
The Lost One
Grandliseur:
I can understand that all creationists being theists.
But I don’t understand how you lump all those who are scientists, including biologists (those who accept evolution) and biochemists (those who are trying to figure out abiogenesis) as being “atheists”.
You keep lumping abiogenesis and evolution as these being the same as atheism.
Atheism have nothing to with science. And neither does theism.
Both atheism and theism only relate to the question of the “existence” of deity or deities, and nothing else. Theists believe in god or gods; atheists don’t. That is all it is. There are no science involved in either of them.
Not all biologists are atheists, just as not all biologists are theists. Most biologists don’t even advertise their religious background and belief, because when working as biologists such beliefs are irrelevant.
It is straw man and gross generalisation.
How do you know that there aren’t Jews or Christians who accept either evolution or abiogenesis?
And abiogenesis is an ongoing hypothesis, meaning it is still undergoing development, researching and testing stages. Abiogenesis is still hypothetical and theoretical. Nothing is certain yet in abiogenesis about how life might have “form” (not “evolve”), and there are several possible scenarios.
Please stop equating atheism with any scientific field. Atheism and science are not the same, never have been, never will be.
I can understand that all creationists being theists.
But I don’t understand how you lump all those who are scientists, including biologists (those who accept evolution) and biochemists (those who are trying to figure out abiogenesis) as being “atheists”.
You keep lumping abiogenesis and evolution as these being the same as atheism.
Atheism have nothing to with science. And neither does theism.
Both atheism and theism only relate to the question of the “existence” of deity or deities, and nothing else. Theists believe in god or gods; atheists don’t. That is all it is. There are no science involved in either of them.
Not all biologists are atheists, just as not all biologists are theists. Most biologists don’t even advertise their religious background and belief, because when working as biologists such beliefs are irrelevant.
It is straw man and gross generalisation.
How do you know that there aren’t Jews or Christians who accept either evolution or abiogenesis?
And abiogenesis is an ongoing hypothesis, meaning it is still undergoing development, researching and testing stages. Abiogenesis is still hypothetical and theoretical. Nothing is certain yet in abiogenesis about how life might have “form” (not “evolve”), and there are several possible scenarios.
Please stop equating atheism with any scientific field. Atheism and science are not the same, never have been, never will be.