Major Proof of God

[TagliatelliMonster]

I realize to some that my answer is ridiculous but to me proof of God is that humans only make instruments that make music. Like J.S. Bach and other such humans.

But only spiders make webs.

Checkmate!

All hail the almighty spider!

 

[Alien826]

NO. Do not corrupt my text be rewriting it. My text is:

Miracles must exist. Proof: impossible miracle is possible through a miracle. Hence, all miracles are possible.

I was just trying to make sense of it. Silly me, I guess. Perhaps you could rephrase it?

 

[The Kilted Heathen]

Dark Energy got Nobel Prize. So, in Universe are these three: Dark Energy, Dark Matter, and matter. Therefore, if a person is religious, he places God as Dark Energy, Paradise as Dark Matter, and matter as matter. If a person is not religious, he invents new essences (new particles, new universes, modified Newton Gravity), which go against the Ockham Razor.

You actually made a whole thread for this stunning feat of mental gymnastics? This section specifically, which was a reply to me asking why there aren't any Nobel Prizes for biblical myths and Creationism, in your prior thread trying to discredit the Theory of Biological Evolution due to a "lack" of Nobel Prizes?

This is not "major proof" in any sense of the word.

 

[questfortruth]

I was just trying to make sense of it. Silly me, I guess. Perhaps you could rephrase it?

This "Proof: impossible miracle is possible through a miracle. Hence, all miracles are possible." means:

1. If something is not possible (for example, for pig to fly), then
2. it is possible. How?
3. by a miracle.

All miracles are defined as impossible things. According to this definition, the miracles exist.

 

[The Kilted Heathen]

This "Proof: impossible miracle is possible through a miracle. Hence, all miracles are possible." means:

1. If something is not possible (for example, for pig to fly), then
2. it is possible. How?
3. by a miracle.

All miracles are defined as impossible things. According to this definition, the miracles exist.

That is a logical fallacy, not proof or evidence. Specifically, it's affirming the consequent.

 

[questfortruth]

That is a logical fallacy, not proof or evidence. Specifically, it's affirming the consequent.

I like the proof. It sounds very good in original form:

impossible miracle is possible through miracle.

 

[Alien826]

This "Proof: impossible miracle is possible through a miracle. Hence, all miracles are possible." means:

1. If something is not possible (for example, for pig to fly), then
2. it is possible. How?
3. by a miracle.

All miracles are defined as impossible things. According to this definition, the miracles exist.

The definition of a miracle is "Not possible by natural means". If you adjust for that, what you are saying is that things that are impossible by natural means are possible by miracles. That doesn't prove that miracles exist.

If you stick with your definition of "impossible things" then you have an impossible thing causing another impossible thing.

 

[questfortruth]

The definition of a miracle is "Not possible by natural means".

I have proof in my wording. In different wording the proof becomes corrupted. So, stick to my wording and formulation:

impossible miracle is possible through miracle.

 

[The Kilted Heathen]

I like the proof. It sounds very good in original form: impossible miracle is possible through miracle.

I understand that you like the wording, but that does not make it proof. It still remains a fallacy. The only proof of flying pigs is flying pigs, not your belief that impossible things can happen and those are miracles.

 

[questfortruth]

proof of flying pigs is flying pigs, not your belief

 

[The Kilted Heathen]

 

[questfortruth]

View attachment 69770