Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Engyo said:His chosen name is Buddhist, but from all appearances, he is not.
Shtef -Shtef said:That's right, Maitreya is a Buddhist name. How do you think he should appear to be considered Buddhist?
Shtef said:I want to know what people here make of this Maitreya character that is supossedly living in London and on the verge of revealing himself to humanity.
If you're unfamiliar with him look up his name, share international and Benjamin Creme.
Engyo said:Shtef -
There is a generally accepted yardstick for deciding which teachings are Buddhist and which are not. These are known as the Three (sometimes Four) Seals of the Dharma. If a teaching is not in conflict with these core concepts then it can be considered Buddhist in general. They are listed in the following thread as "The three marks of conditioned existence":
http://www.religiousforums.com/forum/showthread.php?t=491
If a teaching does not conflict with the concepts of impermanence, not-self, and unsatisfactoriness, then it is provisionally Buddhist. From the little I have read of the gentleman styling himself Maitreya, the things he is teaching do not conform to this standard;thus I do not consider them Buddhist. Admittedly, I have not studied any of his teachings in depth; that is often not required however.
Does this help explain a bit?