TagliatelliMonster
Veteran Member
I assume you're familiar with entropy, correct? The universal Law that explains how the universe tends towards disorder?
Yes.
Can you explain exactly how evolution can completely jettison the concept of entropy, and still be considered as "science"?
Sure.
It's very easy actually.
Go out, look up. See that giant ball of nuclear fire in the sky? You call it "the sun". It feeds the earth with workable energy 24/7.
The earth is not a closed system.
Evolution "jettisons" the concept of entropy about as much as a tree growing does. Or you reading this message.
Because evolution implicitly implies that the universe tends towards order, NOT disorder.
No, it doesn't.
It implies that life can arise ex nihlio from unliving, inanimate material.
Evolution implies no such thing.
Evolution is completely silent on how life originates. Evolution is a process that already existing life (as we know it) is subject to.
Neat trick! How exactly does inanimate material "mutate"? At what point does inanimate material gain the ability to reproduce?
I don't know.
This is the real issue that completely undermines the disproven, mid-19th century "science" of evolution.
So your best argument against evolution, is an argument from ignorance concerning a subject that isn't even within the scope of evolution?
Okay.
Good talk.