Yes but when any Muslim Sunni or Shia visits the big Mosque in Makkah they pray behind the Imam, it does not matter if they are considered Wahabi or Hashemi...
If any Sunni or Shia accepted an Imam Mahdi, would they continue to pray behind those who not only rejected but also abused him?
Is not the importance of having the right Imam itself contained in Imam Mahdi?
Your Imam is your guide, you pick the most righteous to be your Imam, how could an Ahmadi possibly pray behind a non-Ahmadi who rejected a Prophet of God whom the Holy Prophet (saw) ordered to follow when Muslims would be divided like the Jews in the time of Jesus (as). How could one who is not an Imam in Allah's view lead the followers of the true Imam of the Age?
It is against common sense. Comparing Ahmadi to Sunni or Shia is a unfair comparison. Neither is Sunni nor Shia is united and guided under a true Imam, a Prophet of God, and neither are blessed with Khilafat. If we prayed behind such people who in this age have rejected Promised Messiah (as) in majority we would prove ourselves false.
Shia and Sunni division were formed as were the Jewish Sects, from disputes and differences. Ahmadi Jamat was formed under divine guidance at the hands of a Prophet of God, hence cannot be misguided. The same way the Jews who formed the community under Jesus (as) were the saved Jews we are the saved Muslims. The same destruction the Jews who rejected Jesus (as) is being faced by the Muslims who rejected the Jesus (as) of Muslims (Promised Messiah (as). It has been the nature that when a Prophet comes all the signs are fulfilled yet the masses shut their eyes, they deny the wrath of God and excuse it as a normal calamity that will come to pass. They call it a trial and tribulation, yet unlike trial and tribulations they do not overcome it and return to God, rather continue is disbelief and bring upon the ultimate wrath of God.
But that's the point that the guy was making in the video, he said that the Ahmadi Scholars prefer this fear and play the community on this fear..
It is actually quite the opposite. An Ahmadi Muslim will always engage in discussion and speak with non-Ahmadi Muslims. He or She will always be involved in sharing the teachings of the Promised Messiah (as). On the other hand the Sunni and Shia Imam will give speeches on not talking, not eating, not sitting, and not working with Ahmadi Muslims. They will spread falsehood like us being Jewish funded, having a different Quran, 24/7 pretending to be Muslims, etc. Because the reality is that the Ahmadi Jamaat is growing so rapidly due to their cruelties which God punishes them for. The more they persecute the more Allah (swt) brings people into the fold of Ahmadiyyat. Their close friends and families are leaving their fold and they cannot stand it, they are without argument, without reason, admit self-defeat openly many times, and the only way they see fit is to create fear and hatred in the masses. Such would not be needed if they had any ground in the Quran.
The point you raised about Ahmadi not being Muslims is a valid one, I am not here to judge for Allah but the difference I see between a Muslim and a random is that we believe in the Prophet and what he has said, and it is common knowledge that there will be no more Prophets after him, anyways this is not the debate section, thanks for your reply tho.
It is interesting that out of all of the things a Prophet taught it is only the fact that he is a Prophet is offensive. As such was for every other Prophet. There was never any grounds to speak against his teachings, so they always adopted ways to say he cannot be a Prophet. There are so many statements in the Quran that prove no Prophet after Holy Prophet (saw) false, and the biggest sign of truth is the hypocritical belief that Jesus (as) will be last Prophet (in every sense, last to come, last to live, last to bring a law as he is Rasool in Quran). Which is why even clear verses of the Quran are invisible once a person has set his or her mind on falsehood.
